Re: [rrg] More abbreviation expansions

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 28 February 2010 00:34 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93A528C0E2 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.117
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.117 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.117]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WzsMAK6v-+EW for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9E428C0D9 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pvg3 with SMTP id 3so485659pvg.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iynfbVvjx+YezgreoNcexpRFxwA0quxS8DaU1lSdoh4=; b=a79sRK+JzZ4TuJLs4+3TKuCvapfc5QCQbOmWnvVc8jeyCF/vW5mD34LC9cMg8sYmpn iurLul03i69HQI9Q7DQGFFLMy//mFbWtFmlU/MdFi07eZaqkmZj/NaTnAHgqno4uKr7B paGRizZ8TuN9VRQK+D33HnyfalSe3PNWI6Ie8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=iOQNXqLYThcmejOkArGNR2Szwp2Rq84XtfUipm+DD/d2wZyJSGFafvqSozUi+gPfNy n4V+/Bs9pFGU9QxYQeW7lt/RSB8yCSJhRvEdWFpSDLyN+GN3L8SMNdRH3Ff7pYoiZggp X/w0tXXw7Gv6KtDinB4iiMmBVwnlmOucYIF34=
Received: by 10.143.179.2 with SMTP id g2mr1392626wfp.239.1267317244381; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.71.6.175? ([202.133.104.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm1743952pzk.11.2010.02.27.16.34.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B89B9F7.2010707@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:33:59 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
References: <C7ADB85F.3E95%tli@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7ADB85F.3E95%tli@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] More abbreviation expansions
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:34:11 -0000

I have always understood PA to mean Provider Aggregatable
or Provider Aggregated (which is of course only possible
because they are assigned by the provider who will perform
the aggregation).

In terms of history, I have in my archive a note drafted
in 1995 by Daniel Karrenberg at RIPE, entitled
"Provider Independent vs Provider Aggregatable Address Space"
(sent to nanog@merit.edu, cidrd@iepg.org, IANA@isi.edu and
local-ir@ripe.net on 17 May 1995).

"provider assign[ed]" also pops up in my archive from the same
era, but "aggregatable" seems to be the more common usage
(46 vs 18 hits in my archive).

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 2010-02-27 14:41, Tony Li wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've received the following proposed text:
> 
> PA - Provider Assigned: Addresses which cannot be 'taken with you' when a
> site moves to a different location on the network connectivity
> structure; usually assigned by a service provider (hence the name).
> 
> PI - Provider Independent: Addresses associated with a site and which move
> with it when it moves to a different location on the network connectivity
> structure; independent of any service provider (hence the name).
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>