Re: [rrg] Locator

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 12 May 2009 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B788E28C188 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2009 16:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sy7-8rdA9UWh for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2009 16:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18BE28C150 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2009 16:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,184,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="303336770"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2009 23:56:41 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4CNueWx017279; Tue, 12 May 2009 16:56:40 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4CNueMW003473; Tue, 12 May 2009 23:56:40 GMT
Message-Id: <36BE2317-796A-4D99-88E3-80DB673720CA@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Toni Stoev <irtf@tonistoev.info>
In-Reply-To: <200905130231.57818.irtf@tonistoev.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:56:40 -0700
References: <200905130231.57818.irtf@tonistoev.info>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=448; t=1242172601; x=1243036601; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[rrg]=20Locator |Sender:=20; bh=XTDBRjkwLoMENO4btQ+V/TBXOYWfvB+2tjNoRp2Qicc=; b=m31tJsZSkkMMIMtpIB1n3PioluApoOcRoDr5B7rzvwdazL6O2kHV3l93hi aOUPJrO2qYPe59tM4Q61591bnJNkz8Gep635Rfl60SK4AJpk7dvjGfA1R04B 3MvIiRAnVn;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: IRTF RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Locator
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 23:55:09 -0000

On May 12, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Toni Stoev wrote:

> In the general network, what does a universally recognizable locator  
> actually name: a node, an interface, or something else?

That depends largely on your definition of a locator. RFC 1498 would  
have it name a node. RFC 1992 would have it name a transport  
connection endpoint - the underbelly of an application. LISP would  
have it name a network. GSE would have it name a LAN.