Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes
HeinerHummel@aol.com Tue, 08 December 2009 08:21 UTC
Return-Path: <HeinerHummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71773A6922 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:21:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.007, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzHRLTfK9sX8 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:21:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com (imr-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.105.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A693A68A8 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nB88KjCL020908; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:20:45 -0500
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id o.d1d.5aa416e6 (42805); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:20:43 -0500 (EST)
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <d1d.5aa416e6.384f665a@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:20:42 -0500
To: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, christian.vogt@ericsson.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1260260442"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-AOL-SENDER: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:21:25 -0000
In einer eMail vom 06.12.2009 21:31:09 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com: Personally, I wouldn't expect something called "routing research group" to propose a strategy based 100% on host changes and 0% on changes to the routing system. ...unless on April fool's day :-) But we could conceivably propose something based on changes to both, and that would surely be a big mistake. I cannot catch what you hereby mean. Brian, can you explain ? Heiner Brian
- Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Host changes vs. network changes Joel M. Halpern