Re: [rrg] Summary of ILNP
HeinerHummel@aol.com Wed, 23 December 2009 10:26 UTC
Return-Path: <HeinerHummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F883A68C8 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:26:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.445
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.105, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_82=0.6, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgXJQktmsIG0 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:26:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr-db01.mx.aol.com (imr-db01.mx.aol.com [205.188.91.95]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724BB3A67D8 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:26:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (imo-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.136]) by imr-db01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBNAQ0P4026248 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:26:00 -0500
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id 9.bde.5e9c9b53 (65097) for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:25:54 -0500 (EST)
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <bde.5e9c9b53.38634a32@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:25:54 -0500
To: rrg@irtf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1261563954"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-AOL-SENDER: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Subject: Re: [rrg] Summary of ILNP
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:26:19 -0000
In einer eMail vom 22.12.2009 23:47:35 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt rja.lists@gmail.com: PROPOSAL: Identifier-Locator Network Protocol (ILNP) KEY IDEAS: - Provide crisp separation of Identifiers from Locators. - Identifiers name nodes, not interfaces. - Locators name subnetworks, rather than interfaces, so they are equivalent to an IP routing prefix. - Identifiers are never used for network-layer routing, whilst Locators are never used for Node Identity. - Transport-layer sessions (e.g. TCP session state) use only Identifiers, never Locators, meaning that changes in location have no adverse impact on an IP session. BENEFITS: - The underlying protocol mechanisms support fully scalable site multi-homing, node multi-homing, site mobility, and node mobility. - ILNP enables topological aggregation of location information while providing stable and topology-independent identities for nodes. All submitted solutions are dealing with mapping and aggregation in traditional way. Here: "ILNP enables topological aggregation of location information." It takes some Hercules'es to merge them. Obviously the mainstream prevails. By all this en vogue mapping and aggregating I start disliking the name of my own non-conforming TARA model. Effectively it is not topology AGGREGATING, instead it is SKIMMING the topology - the more remote the more,... While I envision confusing discussion about the flurry of submitted mainstream solutions, I may continue to improve/modify my concept without assistance, e.g. by varying the applied scale ratios not only according to the remoteness but as well according to the density of the network (scale ratio 1:1 for deserted though remote areas nevertheless..) I think the group will have to do a lot with bundling and reiterating what has been submitted. Keeping up my patience, Heiner
- [rrg] Summary of ILNP RJ Atkinson
- Re: [rrg] Summary of ILNP HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Summary of ILNP Tony Li