[rrg] Fwd: RFC 5887 on Renumbering Still Needs Work

RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Fri, 28 May 2010 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583F73A6882 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 18:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D+KNJDgVg43Y for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f196.google.com (mail-qy0-f196.google.com [209.85.221.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331D53A6844 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 18:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so1172825qyk.10 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 18:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references:to:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=OTF3DXV4zq03GTYucH/SbKxvZCHPqm1udU9vFxmrBxw=; b=lqlak4110q6X3S8SxwaN7Ar2d41LVi/PMd/k+OXf9qj5NB7SexaJjni2JvKlpho4Ft tA/0WrCDOa+0iQ762JaySNwoNcmFZYuSamp5p7+3mQ57KKOMtWr903wmWj2fMXz7hJk8 VI1RNiKigJ3PQRKR0nATPKs8zvGKc2c43+8CI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references :to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=BKCg0dcgV4OubE/BrUay2pwc1w3F7CkMR+iZF27jX/Ahz368fO7I+SyrDzzdLeVeCi cfAyHFbDcBm4PkjX1aEm3+vigQUCe7iH1ZWnPwHs4y+QX+dqi0VoKK0jwN7LZ1k7LESb CoqVoVTiNUURKEXl68AviELQDCK4ebIvfSNMU=
Received: by 10.224.35.99 with SMTP id o35mr6381363qad.394.1275011763356; Thu, 27 May 2010 18:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.20.3] (pool-70-104-194-43.nrflva.fios.verizon.net [70.104.194.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1025680qyk.1.2010.05.27.18.56.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 May 2010 18:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:56:02 -0400
References: <20100527182647.40219E0690@rfc-editor.org>
To: IRTF Routing RG <rrg@irtf.org>
Message-Id: <38B413E9-3683-4310-866A-6FFE0BE96DB5@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Subject: [rrg] Fwd: RFC 5887 on Renumbering Still Needs Work
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 01:56:16 -0000

This newly minted RFC might be interesting to some here.

Bottom line is that things are better now than they were 
in the past, but still aren't where we'd like them to be
(==> relative to ease of renumbering).

Yours,

Ran


Begin forwarded message:
> From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Date: 27 May 2010 14:26:47 EDT
> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: RFC 5887 on Renumbering Still Needs Work
> mime-version: 1.0
> content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> sender: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org
> errors-to: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org
> 
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>        RFC 5887
> 
>        Title:      Renumbering Still Needs Work 
>        Author:     B. Carpenter, R. Atkinson,
>                    H. Flinck
>        Status:     Informational
>        Stream:     IETF
>        Date:       May 2010
>        Mailbox:    brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, 
>                    rja@extremenetworks.com, 
>                    hannu.flinck@nsn.com
>        Pages:      35
>        Characters: 87131
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>        I-D Tag:    draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-05.txt
> 
>        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5887.txt
> 
> This document reviews the existing mechanisms for site renumbering
> for both IPv4 and IPv6, and it identifies operational issues with
> those mechanisms.  It also summarises current technical proposals for
> additional mechanisms.  Finally, there is a gap analysis identifying
> possible areas for future work.  This document is not an Internet 
> Standards Track specification; it is published for informational 
> purposes.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.