IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rswg] Re: RSWG Adoption Call of draft-rossi-mathinrfcs

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 05 May 2026 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: rswg@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rswg@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB555E979DC8 for <rswg@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 12:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778010613; bh=7gvH2aoXS1w5TLgkmnH5WHytvm5llffPeuw4/AGh4oQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=S/R7dT4P8HEQj5djBBB1xqAEwftJwo+kJxFho3Klh79+4KBvxYjZoLS2aOMUa6t+x bUWF0Z91DpWhELxbeP3BVFVLodXvXxfruKuncOx7wVAkpoKR0ZDPEIefF2xxM/S/os J/32iSUTtDhdMD877NroRiorYVJKzpHSF9owrQfI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3jEWurmnuYu for <rswg@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 12:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D124E979D5D for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 12:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860D21A080A for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 15:50:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (h120.174.139.63.static.ip.windstream.net [63.139.174.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63BE31A192E for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 15:50:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.400.21\))
Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 15:49:52 -0400
References: <9458385F-2D7C-484C-82CB-FE08B6FC73A7@vigilsec.com>
To: RSWG <rswg@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <9458385F-2D7C-484C-82CB-FE08B6FC73A7@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <B3BD9730-1E52-4D11-A3C1-43391358E8CA@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.400.21)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; s=pair-202402141609; bh=bBpwrolq0ybzytNxcCP1oBRw9K+TQC5MFzIFrGxyQ9o=; b=vhF/LkCgWhzsabTcoV3sRqNwnQ48wFI8eixW6ISJUvmoF54JmNH0ojjfvrY/bGGdzikjJmI5iEodoLrKRpb7p4Nl900LcftPajDPL8onObQGxAxLZg8zhzsme7575WJbSwFukrd4sfUSfah2YCgbko1zmrL0tBuuxJ2ST2KYzDoZadycN0a82P46MxqRpravv8gMfVPCgqXFlfAiwz9EkBttE5HyMrmMMZq3LGbr645mWuGGBbuLYtnUO8LIvjiVqSRqgH86kkG94f79iNKO4/ZJJPrHveMkO080mshG9oSLEs1eEaXbIG9Rt33jrv8Z1tmsu0rAIjKiKYpkUOgSOg==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09
Message-ID-Hash: BCWJHXFSW5IIS7RT6S767PSAP3ACTKXN
X-Message-ID-Hash: BCWJHXFSW5IIS7RT6S767PSAP3ACTKXN
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rswg] Re: RSWG Adoption Call of draft-rossi-mathinrfcs
List-Id: "RFC Series Working Group (RSWG)" <rswg.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/3gIZCSMehpFDcKGpiBW8PweWEfo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg>
List-Help: <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rswg-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rswg@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rswg-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rswg-leave@rfc-editor.org>

This document is adopted.  Alexa, please post draft-editorial-rswg-mathinrfcs-00.

Russ

> On Apr 2, 2026, at 12:10 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear RSWG, 
> 
> This email begins a Working Group Adoption Call for draft-rossi-mathinrfcs:
> 
> Title: Mathematical notation in RFCs
> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rossi-mathinrfcs/
> Authors: Alexis Rossi, Martin Thomson, Lars Eggert
> 
> Please review the document and indicate whether you support the adoption of the latest revision as a RSWG document. Supporting adoption means that you consider the work relevant to the RSWG and a good basis to continue, not that the document is complete or ready for publication.
> 
> Silence is not consent.  Please reply to this thread with: “Support” or “Do not support” adoption.  After that, motivation or comments are encouraged.
> 
> The adoption call will run for 2 weeks and end on 16 April 2026.
> 
> For the RSWG  Chairs,
>  Russ

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status