Re: [Rswg] Issue Tracker/Filed Issues

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

On 03-Oct-22 20:29, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi EKR,

Not ekr, but here are my thoughts:

> 
> I am pondering this issue list, and wondering how that shapes into an agenda.  I am also wondering at what pace we want to proceed.  Obviously one doesn't need to sort every issue in one meeting.  The predecessor to this group certainly didn't ;-)

Certainly not, and some of them can surely be handled without needing meeting time. Might I suggest that the chairs orchestrate a process of discussing issues one at a time, to see if there's a quick consensus or if a deep discussion is needed?

> 
> I am thinking that Issue #13 (Produce a real 7991bis) is something of an umbrella for other issues, but that we also need to decide how much energy to put into Issue #12, documenting what we have.  It's not like we've had a lot of energy on this list, and so I am a little concerned about trying to do both.

To what extent do we need more for #12 than what is in draft-irse-draft-irse-xml2rfcv3-implemented-02?

> With regard to Issue #9 about who gets to decide what, I have a simple suggestion, which is this: until this group decides to delegate format aspects that aren't otherwise already the province of the RPC, we continue to set'em up and knock'em down.  If someone brings a proposal for delegation that we like, let's of course consider it, but let's also not block our work on a lack of consensus over such a proposal.

I agree with that, but for the detailed work on #13 (7991bis) and #14 (SVG) it seems fairly clear to me that a design teams approach is appropriate. If we agreed on that too, we could close #9 soon.

Regards,
     Brian

> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Eliot
> 
> On 27.09.22 19:43, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> In Philadelphia we discussed setting up an issue tracker on GitHub
>> to track proposed new issues. I have now done so at:
>>
>> https://github.com/rfcseries-wg/new-topics/
>>
>> I have seeded the issues with the proposed topics I am aware of.
>> If I have missed any or described them inaccurately, please file
>> new issues, comment, etc. Pete is also giving it a scrub to
>> make sure we missed anything.
>>
>> Go ahead and file your new topic proposals. As discussed, any
>> substantive discussion of the issue beyond fleshing out what it's
>> about should be on the list.
>>
>> Note 1: This repo is just for new topics. Once we drafts, we may
>> create new repos for those.
>>
>> Note 2: I believe I have captured the right language for
>> CONTRIBUTING.md, but please file PRs/issues if you Think
>> something is wrong.
>>
>> -Ekr
>>
>>
>>
>