IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rswg] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-03.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2024 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F93C14CEFF for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:59:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WLY94G4qMwiT for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4A11C14CEF9 for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e10746c6f4so1799999b3a.2 for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708113538; x=1708718338; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3JIxNv1rcPU40jUI3/8q7wA6bNRzGXNofBYSCUuR+u8=; b=BgUZBs5eDEp+jRzvnI3ENpUw0gQ3+ouo+UPfOBe3hVxoyxw4hoaPOm7yAXmPK6AtTB kJWbiTzrCFI74d4gmM6Gitcdk7yCsVDd6bRnrG3DbFY84/7azmFJoF3Yu4VOuES7KGS4 xz0DP+9mdGiRM4nYdptop4harfJV7BwBNsMn6DEtDM445O4085M0CmZwiLxRQtEpNtrh MtZXtnYyvLBjr7PyAILWACzW8vWHFwOklWfGBrloARsv4oj7ubYGa2ZZVOsgaWwpnUNw Yop25twY7id1Kx9iFQvNjy894xc0Z5j63DfX/oF9YJasrMuSdrla0m5GZn8qAxo7fvLn 5OJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708113538; x=1708718338; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3JIxNv1rcPU40jUI3/8q7wA6bNRzGXNofBYSCUuR+u8=; b=O0Ec5DPHad2EDuPerxHHzbnijaK+NahF5UNwp8FroO6GqhIEMQ9s6nfGKiF+bXbny6 wyWJWX8jsfxQDd1FhPN+ZM/M9HHCnD6g3JDred7Vml6utOD161QqyHhu86KfkUjOoF5A zieheubMqRSp4kh0Xx0H0tGgo7dW9+uSj0H3trAm0fE4r++9lZg7UbwBe5tVEVPxcRB/ 39YKVLNPLSBP4CTWGNyuOOGOLYGWRUdqqhFy8CkBmq3EIILqQfeGtexJZ7UoQntQJtxz 8tXzXprO2eo1q8FOq8aBdfj0eiib7OQQjcaD2GOy7+rxk6qiIHARAImcjPwKTOGmwHnw o2dA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxl53uCIWl/Ishff+NZkP3bMtjc58wAs8oVKUG6VsYT0pJTmAsP Z5EUZkXKLAqZj5iWGD04RBKXPur/TsQeFlmePX30gfcAT1ANySGyFGG8vOdg
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEHnO+raa1V9PQkKy3w5D+ckqKaphnrV/D4LEink1/kVgAOmQiV7T2ifRWsRt7iVEVUQa00NA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1d11:b0:6e0:f7a3:7201 with SMTP id a17-20020a056a001d1100b006e0f7a37201mr6257224pfx.25.1708113538077; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707? ([2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o9-20020a62f909000000b006e0814dbb3bsm329839pfh.96.2024.02.16.11.58.56 for <rswg@rfc-editor.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <98b8fa60-e738-5fe0-59c3-7f6c51079cdd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 08:58:53 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: rswg@rfc-editor.org
References: <170794763921.33204.17986569217477876069@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <170794763921.33204.17986569217477876069@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/9es9aKiUsuf4y_Mn7U_uqJt1Qao>
Subject: Re: [Rswg] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-03.txt
X-BeenThere: rswg@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RFC Series Working Group \(RSWG\)" <rswg.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rswg@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:59:02 -0000

> dropping the requirement that the RPC use PDF/A-3 standard

I don't believe we have consensus on that and I don't agree with it. IMHO we should continue to require that. Yes, I know there are some loose ends but they aren't our loose ends.

Regards
    Brian Carpenter

On 15-Feb-24 10:53, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> Internet-Draft draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-03.txt is now available. It is a
> work item of the RFC Series Working Group (RSWG) Editorial Stream Working
> Group of the IETF.
> 
>     Title:   Updated RFC Format Framework
>     Authors: Paul Hoffman
>              Heather Flanagan
>     Name:    draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-03.txt
>     Pages:   11
>     Dates:   2024-02-14
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>     In order to improve the readability of RFCs while supporting their
>     archivability, the definitive version of the RFC Series transitioned
>     from plain-text ASCII to XML using the RFCXML vocabulary; different
>     publication versions are rendered from that base document.  This
>     document is the framework that provides the problem statement, lays
>     out a road map of the documents that capture the specific
>     requirements, and describes how RFCs are published.
> 
>     This document obsoletes RFC 7990 and makes many significant changes
>     to that document.  It also updates the stability policy in RFC 9280.
> 
>     This draft is part of the RFC Series Working Group (RSWG); see
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/edwg/rswg/documents/
>     (https://datatracker.ietf.org/edwg/rswg/documents/).  There is a
>     repository for this draft at https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-
>     rswg-rfc7990-updates (https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-rswg-
>     rfc7990-updates).  Issues can be raised there, but probably should be
>     on the mailing list instead.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates/
> 
> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-03
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-rswg-rfc7990-updates-03
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email