Re: [Rswg] SVG/ASCII art and accesibility (was: Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-rswg-rfc7996-issues-00.txt)

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Sat, 08 October 2022 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FC4C14CF19; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 09:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKEt9sZ1enXU; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5033C1522A2; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9162425977B; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KKKtCWh_fVjB; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [47.186.48.51]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AF004259779; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2c11dedd-d055-ec3b-04be-933453523feb@amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:21:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.2
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Alexis Rossi <rsce@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: exec-director@ietf.org, rswg@rfc-editor.org
References: <20220922183747.5EC6A4AE593E@ary.qy> <2691aee2-9e47-d8a0-d13a-559e410d2be7@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <90d3bb18-46f5-70a9-31ae-332f929bf432@gmail.com> <155f037f-e61a-c338-5369-2448735d55e4@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <7D5C2144-A7C4-4719-A42E-0181E4171066@rfc-editor.org> <b98713f4-a068-8c85-64c2-0008d5e838f9@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <30FCA904-7993-45C7-B9E2-DC025F5DBA12@rfc-editor.org> <fdb7ab37-895f-076c-e48b-895571fe3f91@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <bf3a6631-494f-fa95-e2e1-37d084c2abbb@amsl.com> <33064e81-00c7-9d1b-27bb-1ace32c7c1ff@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <33064e81-00c7-9d1b-27bb-1ace32c7c1ff@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/R5P7NZ0lv4KdZ_jw_Nk0BLfa0Ok>
Subject: Re: [Rswg] SVG/ASCII art and accesibility (was: Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-rswg-rfc7996-issues-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: rswg@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RFC Series Working Group \(RSWG\)" <rswg.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rswg@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 16:21:38 -0000

Hi Brian,

On 10/7/22 6:17 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Jean,
>
> On 08-Oct-22 10:55, Jean Mahoney wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> [JM] Repeating here the comment that I've added to issue #20 
>> (https://github.com/rfcseries-wg/new-topics/issues/20):
>>
>> The RPC is updating its procedure for checking artwork to include 
>> reviewing the contents of the SVG <desc> and <title> elements and the 
>> <artwork alt=""/> attribute (when xml2rfc supports it. Issue opened: 
>> ietf-tools/xml2rfc#898 
>> <https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/898>). If the artwork 
>> lacks an accessible description, during AUTH48 the editor will ask 
>> the authors to please provide text. We will also update the Online 
>> Portion of the Style Guide to recommend to authors that they provide 
>> descriptive text for artwork. rfc7322bis 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-flanagan-7322bis-07#section-3.7> 
>> already captures a recommendation regarding artwork accessibility.
>
> That's excellent, of course. But I still lack
>
> a) any drawing tool for SVG that supports <desc>;
[JM] Ack. I've manually inserted <desc> into SVG embedded in RFCXML, and 
it works (that is, the contents appear in the HTML output), but it would 
be good to identify drawing tools that support <desc>.

>
> b) any simple way of testing whether a <desc> or <artwork alt=""/> 
> actually works with a screen reader in the html rendering;
[JM] I'm also looking for a good screen reader or browser plugin to test 
these things. Anyone have suggestions?

>
> c) a good example of a well annotated diagram in xml2rfcv3-conforming 
> xml.
[JM] And this would be good to capture on authors.ietf.org. I've added a 
comment to Issue #42 (https://github.com/ietf/authors.ietf.org/issues/42).

Thanks!
Jean

>
> The third one is probably the most important of all.
>
> Regards
>     Brian
>
>
>
>