Re: [Rswg] Agenda for London
Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Fri, 04 November 2022 20:07 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B2DC14CE2D for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lh7FddgC7_6B for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C64AC14CF0D for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1667592423; bh=eY0XUbnVfRf51s9OpR9kJE5Jn1Qn+qiE/72x2HHn1lI=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=VbwpXHBRa+mOr7If5Uh2HXh8whGiuixWY9a4opQ8KZ1WX/0M1D61LWnXIKQNTA9Bj DtT5I/dUbK7LiT4NidXYOvpp+FKTAhHhSc2g3Xl4G2qknTyzEKPf1HRosZiBE/5gF5 CxJes7z2dl58H/lWKR6EGi4dJSkiNQMZgutOpCIg=
Received: from [192.168.0.222] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPSA id 2A4K72Cp370658 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 21:07:02 +0100
Message-ID: <910adf23-a7ee-09d5-a3cc-133491353db2@lear.ch>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 21:07:01 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, rswg@rfc-editor.org
References: <CABcZeBMZGEb-fkpAKhv2_jYJ7DCHsRZ7PTtqELdvimCB_zhtow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMZGEb-fkpAKhv2_jYJ7DCHsRZ7PTtqELdvimCB_zhtow@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------UUi30FCmQTdM105F0V7oeutg"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/m62_0Qw59t73RtSOc-iXtptig3I>
Subject: Re: [Rswg] Agenda for London
X-BeenThere: rswg@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RFC Series Working Group \(RSWG\)" <rswg.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rswg@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 20:07:13 -0000
Hi Eric and Pete, Thanks for this. Would you mind if we reserve 5 minutes at the end just to checkpoint on our modalities, as in whether or under what conditions we might want to meet once between 115 and 116? It's a long stretch. Eliot On 04.11.22 20:07, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've just (belatedly) posted the proposed agenda for London. This > represents where Pete and I think the energy of the group is (see > below). Please let us know if you think we got something wrong. > > A few lucky people have also been asked to present. We'll add their > names when we have confirmations. > > -Ekr > > > 1300-1305 Administrivia, Note Well, Scribes > > 1305-1325 SVG > Potential Draft: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-rswg-rfc7996-issues/ > > 1325-1355 7991-bis "as-is" draft > Confirm starting point > RFC versus no RFC. > Potential Draft: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-rfc7991bis/ > > 1355-1325 7991-bis > Are we ready to start? > Starting point > Major issues > > 1325-1330 AOB >
- [Rswg] Agenda for London Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Rswg] Agenda for London Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rswg] Agenda for London Pete Resnick