Re: [rtcweb] Dates for rtcweb drafts

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6561A90DE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hy_Qhu94nm1G for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF61C1A90DD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s9EHcsBx005904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:38:54 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s9EHcs52030726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:38:54 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.176]) by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:38:54 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
To: ext Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Dates for rtcweb drafts
Thread-Index: AQHP5HhSXVqbVYoTakSNp2wbJlZlVJwpZe2AgAAGiYCAAAQBAIAABycAgAZqz6A=
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:38:53 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF8194BF99D@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <9B317B02-CB28-40A3-9C7D-6D337682ADD6@iii.ca> <5437BA7C.6060402@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnWo4rTJpYYfGs+kEYxP_gLxqFwU6zgGcxP6dwhBs2F8Rw@mail.gmail.com> <5438104B.7080008@alvestrand.no> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D4750CA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <866C6993-A4D0-4261-845C-DD420413453E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <866C6993-A4D0-4261-845C-DD420413453E@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.117]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1723
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1413308334-00001FC1-94C6FCF3/0/0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/0giH8-TYmbGoKm3yIaDXS0dfZ_g
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Dates for rtcweb drafts
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:39:00 -0000

+1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Bernard
> Aboba
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 7:39 PM
> To: Christer Holmberg
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Dates for rtcweb drafts
> 
> +1.
> 
> 
> 
> > On Oct 10, 2014, at 10:13, Christer Holmberg
> <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >
> > While you try to figure out who should ask the question, I'll give MY
> answer: I think the draft should be adopted as a WG item :)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Christer
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Harald
> Alvestrand
> > Sent: 10 October 2014 19:59
> > To: Martin Thomson
> > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Dates for rtcweb drafts
> >
> >> On 10/10/2014 06:35 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> >>> On 10 October 2014 03:52, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
> >>> I'd like the chairs to indicate whether or not they are going to
> >>> entertain -gateways for WG draft status too.
> >> Maybe you should instead ask the working group.
> >
> > That's the question I think it's the WG chairs' job to ask.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb