IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] H.264 -- Decoder only specification

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D951AE098 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:37:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DxKNDhhz4WV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com (mail-we0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDC91AE068 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q59so7203877wes.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uDXsTJRzRcHVvdUD6AhppIQ3mfGE6EahRM/zkosJrro=; b=TTK7weauYBOlyqS0VacVX8F3Iz5+jgjK/fIlNjrwbJczZtn+v1l/KdS84gNpNo0xCC wCWD+0g5GDet8wUSw6ESPavbbkmidOE+9PsdKJvOOtw/HQXhRHXJc7RZogOUqA2jS1tn RpLrjEdhp5EWSHDglMSkQNYdIAzXT2nnC/fxgPOUIOM3E0IBk195QY/w8J7WI5x4cq4m PufT6zeoM98CtBVsk7mFFd8fylJfKnTbxeQzAQQhxaFkG3G9gxdT+38grOvURXkGOAns Nj2DW4WhiQP8116RbCHVmjQHhvEVkm2d6Q+pBfMtPVtYYFACjrfzL6STYk9RwswEslvN Yt6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxdarKAfQ8+ekAhEALNlvCCpPD3QVWyAxo/sZNWoUBfSAVAkmo423wwTafHc+ApQNy/Spj
X-Received: by 10.180.99.42 with SMTP id en10mr4700818wib.36.1386797813514; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ua9sm1468257wib.9.2013.12.11.13.36.52 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id z12so6978493wgg.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.187.101 with SMTP id fr5mr3416299wjc.76.1386797811906; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.88.133 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F6B64@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CAD5OKxswVxrhjitpkji6+oN--uAk6qJ371+PYwJfidznzxNhTQ@mail.gmail.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F6B64@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:36:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvPZyns5bq8=KhH67wd8gHeYe+EvjsVOp8VL92mw_sh=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6b9acf4444204ed49064e"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.264 -- Decoder only specification
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:37:01 -0000

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:08 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <
keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

>  The only IPR declaration Google have made in IETF for VP8 appears to be
> against draft-bankoski-vp8-bitstream-02
> which appears to be the specification of the format and decoder only, not
> the encoder (and incidentally is 5 or 6 versions removed from the published
> RFC 6386 (individual submission)).
>
> I am quite happy to be corrected on the above.
>
> Would I also be right in assuming this is what has been submitted to
> ISO/IEC JTC1, and therefore in that group any IPR declarations will only be
> against the coding format and the decoder?
>
> Your statement of the encoder being free appears to apply only against the
> Google implementation, and does not appear in any of the SDO material?
>
>
>
I cannot speak on behalf of google regarding their submissions to various
standard groups. My statements were related to Google VP8 implementation
which is part of the WebM: http://www.webmproject.org/license/additional/
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email