IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-24: (with COMMENT)

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Fri, 22 December 2017 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E614812D80F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:25:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BbJ3CddqpTTF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4137112D7F9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:25:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id q13so18784863uaq.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:25:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mToGk8npejFtdv7ffIEpQQQWcnndxb5BFwW3do0+Vag=; b=ouLAkj4D96kq+V203qRSWear/KsOJuwSqd/w0w0taVcs7BEhkJqzrGZ+V7qqCG3RIs d1DW2dIczgktbXu34uewC8nmkEqIngXMHJoUmapgfxzfNdJPxtnYggJH0BSuyD19VV6+ eh5SM0tNJoaY6LhEDHSUDD113F/KA9/wMy47lbd88ywlyhviWA5PUKfy4R9XBgkH9KJ1 /XPuYiQ8zCICqbz7Qx1i4MK4JaoVHSIdljysBB3bWCnFzrZ2/HZ1rgsdCyl6ZmCvi9x3 apCFmAR57M72qqzW0OtWpMzo7wwPOOLDq4rk2n/Zfp5C1NSVAEiMef6x8exLgaRgoUhy VA+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mToGk8npejFtdv7ffIEpQQQWcnndxb5BFwW3do0+Vag=; b=glDBRHYSgvzs0jLyHoSQPGxgzDW92DoIyoQ1nN4kLwlrxtUnP58RMpFG7qIvkrp1ox ZhQnyFWibP+nauvsUsZBuHeZx2soX9I12GXWpWoLK94J3qM3S/JnAfm4IalKXwqB/loc l1tLqWHupUksnw1bHSU7PSyK+IMmUvOMQSsB8CccIzJ8UT/PhThoaUIYDY1ds2QERJ7c FEe6/3+QCxSeNDTpkkR0NN3GsL4vuI1pjay2+5E7INaz78PsRO0QS/qx7Owy+040FAzX ao/IpclOn4z3z0fadGRSRc4ir9QFuZAOqSBfYa2VbIpJT0wLG71LpYteDLWcyAmDxyIi 7LUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mK9slJ2QXMT8lj744OzIob3duHJbYMjH0tbE4DlfomJGFUZp2ox NNDlUdbDyGN9y+4FXzSw6Io7oFFSn8SSaS+jEYuY7A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotUS2y/h6BHfpdTp7fCy1hFnS9qytvOCiYf0aDHgpWGIQrC8O6m29u/xt5/z5AdJIpO3tkoGZXP+NqQhnIuWQ8=
X-Received: by 10.176.80.252 with SMTP id d57mr14381250uaa.203.1513909533943; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:25:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.178.204 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:25:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <151311562760.14100.8542671795905150712.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <151311562760.14100.8542671795905150712.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:25:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2LabkjMveWzugKqT6b6nMa3r9tsZSZTVjORvEi1pTmgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep@ietf.org, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c191078fea4ec0560e487db"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/2OVRIHyZ1wfGgVIlD62GHp4c2_w>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 02:25:44 -0000

Thanks, will fix in -25.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <
Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-24: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm sure the RFC editor would have caught this nit:
>
> 2nd paragraph of security considerations section:
> While formally the JSEP interface is an API, it is better to think of
>    it is an Internet protocol
> s/is an Internet/as an Internet/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email