[rtcweb] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-24: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 05:42 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03B71200F3; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:42:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep@ietf.org, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, ted.ietf@gmail.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.67.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151323013465.6079.10099272164953886555.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:42:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/4X5U8QSIUGba_l6VT5jGB3hyUwY>
Subject: [rtcweb] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 05:42:14 -0000
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-24: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I found myself wishing that Section 3.8 was a bit clearer about the advantages of sequential versus parallel forking. I can imagine some of the advantages because I have a SIP background, and I can dig some of what I was expecting to see in 3.8.2, but I'm imagining and digging, and I'm betting that the document could be more explicit about the tradeoffs - just saying "if you're communicating with a SIP endpoint, most of them can only exchange media with one endpoint at a time" is already helping.
- [rtcweb] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-rtcwe… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [rtcweb] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-r… Justin Uberti