[rtcweb] Seeking reviewers for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 15 June 2018 20:15 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818FD130E57 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ieOJwQ62TMv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22e.google.com (mail-ot0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 717A6130E44 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id r18-v6so12340512otk.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UkG5ERwRPk5gSpHYzMyK1M+ku0SJyJgjc9OM/NT1jj8=; b=HCFqtybI1YExSA+73sf7n9EispQqReZwmE9DfAGK5ji9fYVoxlgA6L+O/zSHRHAPn+ c6rsqP4uuWxWnJsrRJloE7WjDpyIt2q0AYzhvSwdSeI+WZ9aFNpv8WYmx1F3NhYI6qo7 vsAFiPyrT/e965gpJUr+l01LrBVTZO94GlCYuX2+UC6sw9FvZTkQrvqcueM1WKi8bAvI wyJgnm3XLsdkR/LbD2QmRyzUPqXqlXk1DQuOtUArMtbWuAMZ3+QkqJ//ssieGLm3Ic/j ZmQv2ug8YdAxZgXs3HxcPqoybnk6/0DVSklKQ/9Bgp/CclHU1DcByhoWNZjrrHHW5fYo AcxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UkG5ERwRPk5gSpHYzMyK1M+ku0SJyJgjc9OM/NT1jj8=; b=mtWcMZPGIpKJd93U5ZXBnJiVQPzAz0/ywAwAc4wZmtsTFImwPjSfEHbeA09XBtt5Hw kCGQz68XLhgZ86o6ZEv+RL1eoKICt53HqJQVffvB5sQG/9cBMcb/Vu79pdJIz9J/foAV RVLFes98Z4V+25WdeU63Vajnef94VuM3E4zvfiXksRuFE64DO+wUuWt2vwU8ykG/rC/G fQDg1a8D4fod+5I1ssyLec+tw8P2HqaRkFPhvAYsdJB+exRLcsxQvItqypt28XNY7xGd sEqkgnH6c/4CxCFQniMQgg5sNjVlJ+wbmmpqzOOjEghZjzqb3zFDuWpBwJJ2hg4KImci HVsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3f0cvricux3IYBehZdeyVmFIzb8ExKG+nkc9iIoUUsJmeAl8/Y LpW1B8pRxLcatULjc99rccOh6Obi+3scmKaQsIBMxQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLFpMAeYDzMC3W2Z+AoewjO51JQS2lhWD8mOMDgUN4qhyOuZ5csikeg/DFo2g05JI/6cTXXW3SySEeEyBuBSjM=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5201:: with SMTP id e1-v6mr1838088oth.396.1529093755660; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:15:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUSwvgFfP_7UrwbZf662tsYhcs0e7evN-74M5cf+__4Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/5-t6me_OquE3NgHLs4iNPuP7Lk0>
Subject: [rtcweb] Seeking reviewers for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-uks
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 20:16:00 -0000
Hi Folks, We've this draft in mmusic that addresses a minor, but annoying hole in SDP negotiation. We've had some review of this and we think that it's basically good, but we'd like to see more review before we decide to publish. It's a little tricky to understand, so we're particularly looking for feedback on helping to improve the description of the attack. Cheers, Martin
- [rtcweb] Seeking reviewers for draft-ietf-mmusic-… Martin Thomson