Re: [rtcweb] Sending of zero-length messages over data channels

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 23 July 2014 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984181A0ACA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBgNv1SH2c-Q for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D12D1A02F8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lx4so917989iec.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Vnmm+mhJE7OyQGwU4ek1PCABT+HPjD1mJX6QBZ3FYIg=; b=ETP8mhp5ePEl2E7VElP9HWr0qodZvsimQj2GP4zJKd/6lGzIHyLClLlcVRkx8TWTTf SPi1R2o+OR4chEq/hhKX6PQ0uPdMHRWDF0W+vD1WJ+HHuO4ygXb8GQ0wwRlJ6NlQrhYr TgJ4xujXPhFiran84gubAc4W9pfFZaxtI9kbyQ2Fb2EYv5WlWexDPpaBxMaiWHWlXpse HxVBrseYppVyvsnNCgFQz1j1HpGI1CHZYPRAm5Md/B6gDElhxg3BmygYgd/8uSQrG9O1 lHWCHOHkjtnVcah4G0sdte3gpa/+ACjVjVQEixuWTHH5Lw1ZBLbgOl/TwpqnKoE+MJO8 WqsQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.84.76 with SMTP id k12mr2973355icl.18.1406120119756; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.154.80 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0F9pysYLehjTVDv1Sxz3TKaxi2y6J7RrpGqMdA=tiR_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOJ7v-0F9pysYLehjTVDv1Sxz3TKaxi2y6J7RrpGqMdA=tiR_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:55:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDNzunHruYYWTRi-iqHo1LDE4+AYKaVx5dty8DOMDD0YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30363feb3fecfb04fedbdaec"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/5HOCIr6PiHaqN-41wM0hjaW5dps
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Sending of zero-length messages over data channels
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:55:21 -0000

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> I
> Since we can't send a zero-length SCTP message, I propose we add a
> PPID_EMPTY value or something similar to indicate a message with empty
> content.
>
>
​Howdy,

The keepalive problem seems to be pretty amenable to any message, whether
of zero length, single byte or something else.  Is the convergence with
websockets on zero length important enough to re-open the drafts we just
sent to the ADs?

Ted