[rtcweb] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sun, 23 April 2017 21:07 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF072126C25; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, sean@sn3rd.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149298164497.25799.12404999252192696478.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:07:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/7NpoPX5qXBzvsV09vYsCcSyMYnY>
Subject: [rtcweb] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 21:07:25 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you -- I like these sort of overview documents for complex things like WebRTC - they provide a newcomer to the technology a good place to start, and help describe some of the reasons why things look the way they do. I do have a few comments on the document itself - there are all minor / bikeshedding and can be ignored if you choose: 1: "Development of The Universal Solution has proved hard, however, for all the usual reasons." -- this is cute, but leaves people wondering what "all the usual reasons are". Perhaps just "Development of The Universal Solution has, however, proved hard." (or just cut after the "however in the original"). 2: I'm not sure why you have "Protocol" in the terminology section. It doesn't seem like it is useful for the document, and this document doesn't seem like the right place to (re) define it. 3: Acknowledgements: Funny spacing in "Olle E. Johansson"
- [rtcweb] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ie… Warren Kumari