IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 DTLS heartbeat

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 14 January 2015 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B828B1ACE46 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6FDxW2-TT4MT for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17ECD1ACE3D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u20so9569369oif.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CODmUKRRYr1A7epYTfPO03VgKuAXPyErBjosZZVjHrk=; b=uHjKjP8PGMCyoxtbQ+DjI930X3QgD6RsTKNmiYg3aNGkRaLVqUnaMXnmWsZBZq/yAK GrNaerK+R77ZygErUfEzs1GzzRbrNePvICpo/Q8cjnWmchXjz7MWRB6s0BOwoFd8KVMS vtIOZyDbo2wUOTtofaRfMQ/ATTqQQJ3WweWSRh+K3E/Q39SHxteDy0/WdfokfAkQcibd g4R5ALm5sCa+Ib+fmjyxsAgXkr3PDqR8eGnjTTwSXLu12nfcqHe11HyEeeX+gZE1UfEm e/wgRPYfyVZrsmW68xF0fT9uSXOhQA/3FMXWyIO8RRI+a3mjDAIE3mw57RJNOmW7ywE0 PUaw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.75.202 with SMTP id y193mr3773368oia.12.1421273842451; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.226.136 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54B6E9BC.2060203@alvestrand.no>
References: <CAOW+2dsaAOmOS=VZe8VTRoSSjN0TAQzY2kXaOqHUCAf9jaA5Mw@mail.gmail.com> <DD273892-F62C-423C-A4FF-0BA8288A5454@lurchi.franken.de> <CABkgnnU9D7kq9R_QtLcyw58jiyYLrvLjK==X=ur1=btesdpVCw@mail.gmail.com> <1C5B610D-DA15-4DC6-82B3-E518748B1222@lurchi.franken.de> <54B6E9BC.2060203@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWdQPZHGU8iGov5DAGKy3LGE0Y_E=8=ScghkR1A44ntTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/7vvA4Hk8MuhCLmXtDW5c2WyWU9E>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 DTLS heartbeat
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 22:17:24 -0000

On 14 January 2015 at 14:12, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> So which document should we put it in that we use the second option?
> -transport, or a post-last-call update of -datachannel?

I think that -datachannel is most appropriate.  It's very late though;
if chairs think that it's too late, -transports or even -security-arch
(under its DTLS profiling remit) are probably OK places to squeeze it
in.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email