Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 DTLS heartbeat
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 14 January 2015 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27EF1B2A65 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:19:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zT76HNDTJeCq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD7F1B2A64 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3087C3BC1; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:19:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CfVUXzyhiKdM; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:19:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:27:9942:e49f:e26a:f368] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:27:9942:e49f:e26a:f368]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 177E57C0160; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:19:07 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54B6F96A.4060507@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:19:06 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <CAOW+2dsaAOmOS=VZe8VTRoSSjN0TAQzY2kXaOqHUCAf9jaA5Mw@mail.gmail.com> <DD273892-F62C-423C-A4FF-0BA8288A5454@lurchi.franken.de> <CABkgnnU9D7kq9R_QtLcyw58jiyYLrvLjK==X=ur1=btesdpVCw@mail.gmail.com> <1C5B610D-DA15-4DC6-82B3-E518748B1222@lurchi.franken.de> <54B6E9BC.2060203@alvestrand.no> <7CEBA9FD-CCAE-473B-92FC-7E951317CEF4@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <7CEBA9FD-CCAE-473B-92FC-7E951317CEF4@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/pOcagCnCJfVKiPye8XnelnoClCY>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 DTLS heartbeat
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:19:13 -0000
Den 14. jan. 2015 23:40, skrev Michael Tuexen: > On 14 Jan 2015, at 23:12, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> >> Den 14. jan. 2015 21:06, skrev Michael Tuexen: >>> On 14 Jan 2015, at 18:17, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 14 January 2015 at 00:49, Michael Tuexen >>>> <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: >>>>> * DTLS does the PMTUD using DTLS heartbeats >>>>> * SCTP does the PMTUD using SCTP HEARTBEAT and PADDING chunks >>>>> >>>>> My understanding is the RTCWeb uses the second option as described in >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-13#section-5 >>>> >>>> SGTM. That means we don't need to reference the DTLS heartbleed extension. >>> It is not referenced in the RTCWeb documents, only in >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07 >>> which allows both options. >> >> So which document should we put it in that we use the second option? >> -transport, or a post-last-call update of -datachannel? > Do we really need a change? We have in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-13#section-5 > Incoming ICMP or ICMPv6 messages can't be processed by the SCTP > layer, since there is no way to identify the corresponding > association. Therefore SCTP MUST support performing Path MTU > discovery without relying on ICMP or ICMPv6 as specified in [RFC4821] > using probing messages specified in [RFC4820]. The initial Path MTU > at the IP layer SHOULD NOT exceed 1200 bytes for IPv4 and 1280 for > IPv6. Good! I misunderstood what "it is not referenced" referred to above. > > In the next revision of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07#section-4 > there will be the sentence: > The path MTU discovery is performed by SCTP when SCTP over DTLS is > used for data channels (see Section 4 of > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-data-channel]). I think the section number is wrong - section 4 of data-channel is requirements. (unless revised). > > Best regards > Michael >> >>> >>> Best regards >>> Michael >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rtcweb mailing list >>> rtcweb@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtcweb mailing list >> rtcweb@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >> >
- [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 DTLS… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 … Michael Tuexen