IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with COMMENT)

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 20 April 2017 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A74612785F; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WVkzZz3y95E; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131F5127977; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y63so29028037qkd.1; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OvEeSz6sYHH55hViEU1+ZO44AdqP3Ac1GwQobFxuKvI=; b=brSltiC2ByBrdJ0vHr/cpPafsWrKgPKHYtIYQTg20AHQFdefPAJDYgwH/iYWCBNyqg 04lxXCiSr3iugPuqzUnCzHe62BB3GNdu68qxr3Z0mERIO/Y3aLjlvQwuOdfWuns7Lg2i 0CeGhsKIKIPJP8GIzFWj+DJH+UecNPJBGm+yV8ouA3G29Z9ZmxcmCKcMVmkKXC+L5c88 i3OxLxJBholSF9+yL+O3QpezK0JWy3SjcvqtIm6UqTP6oOOCeHOzOLcuWSdzElPy58Nj Hdk8RtDqriaDcInA8ZKa3aJc84s3byPFhcMpk74xzKVzC+iltfUW1WZ52nwCMC2r/9mQ EIDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OvEeSz6sYHH55hViEU1+ZO44AdqP3Ac1GwQobFxuKvI=; b=aDXJsaM2ynrHt8goMgvff254e8LmgJR7izjPbkIU9laxZ2Dh5S1SPPnm3azUBCEeBG Vy8HYDSZP5a8PCUluZJlK+KgiR3FWjPCEJSU+nUMozSKDgOYiqpo+1/U0i+cA3tFDSYP XEiCpW2Vupf7A/fn1LuNAgkJhBBM0oDR0g2Pf/+IuM/GkbyOFgxFBvgJm+2tJbkUA8iX iW3aRyc9Ijgm+8BdRNmgwqYQafGMYY5x0Ka+XFfE0uRe34W0hqVSYg6vz/QLgvxaUAdV zqcPMghRYDxQYRvS2a13H0TCPsHbT21brPti4Tds0YV+4l9SBWSHfk6Wg5fW9Fm73YNZ goYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6EsL1ztsawbt3sORVomyq6MtaVIv38VbRPaA/gTs6h3adB4huN TKkE48QwP0HMgrOJuiTssZ+Q5nXckw==
X-Received: by 10.55.160.143 with SMTP id j137mr9857374qke.119.1492728086632; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.56.157 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149272773758.22277.5303623973493888340.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149272773758.22277.5303623973493888340.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:40:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDDfxEHThzKGz6gjxG5VYW7GY_p+Xv7EN0x3htZ0F3CPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fc82459a390054da0d7fe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/7w6JSnfmsI7D0cVdYQOYIF8aHVU>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:41:31 -0000

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
wrote:

>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Last time I checked the document is referencing normatively 2 expired
> drafts (security considerations and security architecture). What is the
> plan for completing them?
>
>
They both went through WG last call and then got put aside until the work
on JSEP finished.   We should have changed the status so that they did not
expire, but failed to do that.  My apologies for the oversight.

Refreshing them is on the top of the WG list after JSEP moves to the IESG
(currently being updated after Adam's AD review).

Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email