Re: [rtcweb] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-14

Thank you - I have filed this review as
https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/rtcweb-transport/issues/21 and will address
it after the Last Call ends.

Den 07. juli 2016 23:33, skrev Alissa Cooper:
> I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF last call. It is in good shape and I have requested the last call.
> 
> While the last call is ongoing, I would like to double-check that this document (particularly Section 4) raises no new security considerations that should be documented in Section 6. I'm wondering if there are scenarios where a malicious application could try to game the priority scheme to some ill effect? draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos talks a bit about this, so I'm wondering if anything needs to be said here.
> 
> And I found a couple of nits to be resolved together with any LC comments:
> 
> - Sec 3.2 - Please update the citation to point to draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-dualstack-fairness-02.
> 
> - Sec 3.4 -
> 
> "Third, using TCP only between the endpoint and its relay may result
>    in less issues with TCP in regards to real-time constraints, e.g. due
>    to head of line blocking."
>    
> This is awkwardly phrased. I would suggest something like "Third, using TCP between the client's TURN server and its peer may result in more performance problems (due to head-of-line blocking) than using UDP."
> 
> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 