IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Something new for the RTCWEB requirements document ..

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Sat, 05 May 2012 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C522F21F8497 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 May 2012 09:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.313
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.574, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAAxuuWT+KGM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 May 2012 09:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DED21F8473 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 May 2012 09:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W98 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 5 May 2012 09:21:24 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU169-W98877321F269373CCA50D6932D0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_cc2624d3-fa1e-4c01-b03a-c3ecdaaf57ed_"
X-Originating-IP: [24.16.96.166]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 09:21:23 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <000001cd2a60$ea022ad0$be068070$@us>
References: <000001cd2a60$ea022ad0$be068070$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2012 16:21:24.0444 (UTC) FILETIME=[1D7B59C0:01CD2ADB]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Something new for the RTCWEB requirements document ..
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 16:21:25 -0000

>From RFC 2804:

   The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has been asked to take a
   position on the inclusion into IETF standards-track documents of
   functionality designed to facilitate wiretapping.

   This memo explains what the IETF thinks the question means, why its
   answer is "no", and what that answer means.From: richard@shockey.us
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 21:46:38 -0400
Subject: [rtcweb] Something new for the RTCWEB requirements document ..

 http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57428067-83/fbi-we-need-wiretap-ready-web-sites-now/ <sigh>  Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting
Chairman of the Board of Directors SIP Forum
PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us>
skype-linkedin-facebook: rshockey101
http//www.sipforum.org 
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email