[rtcweb] Adopting -firewall- (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-00.txt)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 23 August 2013 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E0611E81AF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.068, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xt-NUCHMQUIm for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8F411E80F1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA1E39E22B; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:44:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wq5AR56A6+B9; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:44:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:27:d007:1213:66b0:895a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:27:d007:1213:66b0:895a]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3385939E080; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:44:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5217834A.9090202@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:44:10 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
References: <20130819171507.30712.24757.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17B96401@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17B96401@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: [rtcweb] Adopting -firewall- (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:44:26 -0000

On 08/20/2013 06:31 PM, Hutton, Andrew wrote:
> Section 2.2 "Middle Box Related Functions" should also I assume cover the case of using a HTTP Proxy or an enterprise TURN server and reference http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01 assuming we can get this adopted.
>
> Regards
> Andy
Chairs, where are we on the question of whether the WG wants to adopt
-firewall- or not?

       Harald