[rtcweb] Gateways draft
Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 03:54 UTC
Return-Path: <aallen@blackberry.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187BC1AD53D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:54:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QMVrauPaobSi for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-p01.blackberry.com (smtp-p01.blackberry.com [208.65.78.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907A11A88AF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xct108cnc.rim.net ([10.65.161.208]) by mhs211cnc.rim.net with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 10 Nov 2014 22:54:38 -0500
Received: from XCT104CNC.rim.net (10.65.161.204) by XCT108CNC.rim.net (10.65.161.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:54:38 -0500
Received: from XMB122CNC.rim.net ([fe80::28c6:fa1c:91c6:2e23]) by XCT104CNC.rim.net ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:54:38 -0500
From: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gateways draft
Thread-Index: Ac/9YzaE4Jf1gPATTiGmh8DmnJoxhA==
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:54:37 +0000
Message-ID: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD23399565DD@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.160.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/C4rntwAnFtHFrPB9agKyKttHpfk
Subject: [rtcweb] Gateways draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:54:46 -0000
One comment on one of Harald's statements during the brief presentation. Harald said we might allow Gateways not to support OPUS. Is this a good idea? Use of G.711 by WebRTC clients connected via narrowband networks is not a good idea so the gateway needs to support OPUS even if it is going to do PCM on the other side. Andrew
- [rtcweb] Gateways draft Andrew Allen