[rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data channel m-lines, right?
Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Wed, 21 January 2015 22:19 UTC
Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD071A1A34 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FD6zUNsb94uK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8978E1A00BB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id ft15so23156529pdb.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:19:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Y4NJxH1L767DGMDkuCrbehH0SFaMyX3mhDPP56JeG80=; b=GZLOz3fSics0Kvfgi9cUO3tddo/iZ/EFhvMF3BYnDnhYBXKCWygZUuQxLwZ/tdtBSg 2b7CaGQWXFOoFNvM8VsLr5MYLe4G3TU8CMhmbuYeDUIDMTrjMsrWDZgd2P5ExP85xd9m TyCuNbc5JyBQnudd2OsWHnwoec2mfhplwcXjYwpFCqAH88tuq4jhR6T7h3sjbtu4snfg DGfUmC3rBvxoyDIhn5lmlkX1WfoqIE59FaHkPrp91Y+6wPymYVe2C0axVJLjJgsr7oih 9YCGduY4zDaiahdl+LddEnrgdH9tBwA1oPGTjYdrjqziReU4J9g2PsC7V51DoqwBAICO CtMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Y4NJxH1L767DGMDkuCrbehH0SFaMyX3mhDPP56JeG80=; b=c1OhRbQrv4/YyOs31UpOjIQypkzIk0BU7U05k+U3LiPMDAodwgNjRhiuJfxOjhUJnk pdDNGD1No8dTb+iWJ231nqjIq5yTNGQYR37gkRgr47xWx+CpJsMcPbwU2GkftAH4I+TL /rpLP97Dox/SBSCc6vJTtQIxao+osn2Td1T7cDoSMmHtGma7GnysoUx6AUv0B/XV5DwP DJlYp7Fmi3Fhi8Kg7b3hLIsx0BOlxQeU4V78oji1rNkRLCwYmf2hECQ3HFe0ZZnJMmko QofwGq6qyu6lyL1YSm5i6rNvaxKLOpjNvvPOOujyELXksUoB8b+2/Wgz/PA8nXKNj9IA f78g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlaKtcM8HUFMkKPD3C7R2ZXLgpyLINgrrUbjJAvWID+87YN5tepf+DMdmeALBjrorSxXTXq
X-Received: by 10.68.242.8 with SMTP id wm8mr56478348pbc.32.1421878776716; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:19:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.86.167 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:18:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:18:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUEBBQmaixOJ+oOsUefw-YwyOYQnm8CBn15VpbjSL5xhtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b339c37667b99050d30f3e0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/EH2hZykohv7LIlvi34qxAZchvQ0>
Subject: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data channel m-lines, right?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:19:38 -0000
W e're working on implementing draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-12 and going through the process of making the change while not breaking things and we'd like to not have to do this a second time. Before making this change, I'd like to be doubly clear that I got the right value for data channel m-lines: "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" (or "TCP/DTLS/SCTP") Is that for sure the right value?
- [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data channe… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Christian Groves
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Christian Groves
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] It's "UDP/DTLS/SCTP" for the data ch… Harald Alvestrand