IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk> Sun, 15 April 2018 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A2212751F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cw5NjRyYaAKS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E355126C0F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 75467 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2018 07:22:59 -0000
X-APM-Authkey: 255286/0(159927/0) 31
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp002.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 15 Apr 2018 07:22:59 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51C818A04B3; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 08:22:58 +0100 (BST)
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra003.verygoodemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id maBFJt62cK91; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 08:22:58 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (cable-82-119-15-228.cust.telecolumbus.net [82.119.15.228]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23F9F18A049B; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 08:22:58 +0100 (BST)
From: westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Message-Id: <251716DB-7292-4D75-8FD9-ABF2182302A1@westhawk.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7E54B455-3B2B-4CC5-B564-E76F3B84FF4D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 09:22:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <A5F42D69-6ECB-4A03-8A54-F081624F13D0@nostrum.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip@ietf.org>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <152274059303.13991.7963954297164952826.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <abc6dbc9-5500-bf51-c003-c4d9affe612f@mozilla.com> <E24F839C-DC79-41DA-8742-33F2EB9634BC@nostrum.com> <ba4a3f03-9180-4b30-c672-b893fc19d241@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBPQ32XX1j1a0VCuytC+mv9b7Gv_uNK5kbufPfOMGxPw-A@mail.gmail.com> <F5C281C6-2B72-4B33-AACC-DA8E7B43CB94@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBMNFxJ+OjffyFOSB4YPg+i9YTTC+KetqL-6HtO0BHsY+w@mail.gmail.com> <BDA42C0E-1CBC-4F1D-860B-A5BD513362F7@nostrum.com> <6b2e132d-88ee-9274-b19d-c24937e46ad2@nostrum.com> <CAMRcRGTWTqNfO_v911JN4wcWtyd8TXQFgp_rR9z13ug=YQWtWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGROerxxcS-9KUAt6rfceWBL=GJ9GrhjzJAC4Q17p7gcLw@mail.gmail.com> <07de7983-293d-f97e-8ca9-08713ce48e1c@mozilla.com> <3E157C5A-A2CD-4361-9BFE-B87EA71D8FFD@nostrum.com> <CAMRcRGRcMZim6J+Ts-wSrbPzjrr3c6m9gBkKosk1Xi56UuLusQ@mail.gmail.com> <dfce4246-b000-3421-25a4-844f6865053c@mozilla.com> <8BBC3434-DEA2-437B-AB32-DA113AE085AA@nostrum.com> <D6F67849.2DED5%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <A5F42D69-6ECB-4A03-8A54-F081624F13D0@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/EJbFwhAQ6x6D9xET7hk0mnPAldQ>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 07:23:04 -0000


> On 13 Apr 2018, at 16:56, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, Adam and I have been discussing this with the RTCWEB chairs. We’ve since discovered that this is not the only JSEP normative reference chain back to SIP. The RTCWEB chairs are currently discussing whether they can live with that. They may decide to just reference things as they stand. If their answer involves a request to restructure anything, I will pull in the authors and MMUSIC/ICE chairs.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.

For what it is worth, I’d argue we can live with it.
My thinking is that having a reference chain back to SIP in the documents reflects
the reality of RTCWeb 1.0 implementations. The SDP is there because it was believed
that using it would make interop with other (typically SIP based) systems easier.

Much of the actual implementations grew out of SIP heritage codebases.

I think it is only reasonable that the documents reflect this reality.

T.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email