[rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 28 February 2019 18:00 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2719B12F1AB; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:00:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-security@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, sean@sn3rd.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.92.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155137680815.28736.10104782585142415268.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:00:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/EQMudXInQPKVba02HTFVIdLN3m8>
Subject: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:00:08 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-11: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think this document is clearly informational. Other RTCweb documents should refer this document informatively and only reference the sec arch doc normatively. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I would have also expected some discussion about the risks to the user if the browser gets corrupted, as indicated by the trust model presented in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch. Alternatively, this document could go in the appendix of draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch instead.
- [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… Adam Roach