Re: [rtcweb] Updated -gateways draft

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> Uwe and I have prepared a new -gateways draft (version -01).
>
> I don't think there's much controversial in it, and there's only one
> issue that I think needs WG time at this time:
>
> Should it be Informational or Standards-track?
>
> An informational document defines guidance for how gateways should
> behave, but nobody needs to pay attention if they don't want to.
>
> A standards-track document (which no other RTCWEB document should be
> dependent on) defines requirements for how things that call themselves
> "WebRTC gateways" should behave, but nobody needs to call their gateways
> that, and anyway, there's no protocol police, so the difference isn't
> all that much in practice.
>
> More important: What do people want it to be?
>
>
I think we adopted it in part because 3GPP had a dependency on it.  Does
it need to be standards track for them to reference it?

Ted

> Harald
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>