Re: [rtcweb] Drop RFC 4588 RTX session multiplexing support requirement from RTP USAGE

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Tue, 28 October 2014 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776BD1A1AA5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rM3TeB3J14ZP for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4CCE1A1A84 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id h11so867528wiw.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=DhnSzvC3WP374j5iLaiDNwrnNQ2WIqea78xhhi3nR9U=; b=t9BCERgMnGJqvnSFWIQQOHGQZk7b0MKuCVgKoGrjXC1U9jHXVcImEfcUmPmdjoVhQJ BQPWsP6UZ3oZ7cBsMOnyALHCS/kgK5MSr7jAOF8Ca9UCqRZTYI4NfItFsCLmkKHwCoLd W3L9RZeRfpsaE5x2MOGTdXXBwf3hs5k41xNfFEjI9TEdtU3EYA5e0F4iAeZDu46DelPV ZmCLzaC9Hyaih/jZGR3oal6DMWHJVANj3Mlsxr7JN00RS2sjBd8dgFd7yNR/+XhKyA5r QYZEgYmtd6iKJgaL18K+tsNBI9B9lZ/nXmhn4FAuoIx35bSIwrXlWmP/oa8XidTPzPEc Pmmg==
X-Received: by 10.181.27.161 with SMTP id jh1mr2883844wid.75.1414487404637; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.37] (144.Red-83-43-188.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.43.188.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cw6sm1076120wjb.18.2014.10.28.02.10.03 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <544F5D76.3020907@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:10:14 +0100
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <5446ACD8.1010004@gmail.com> <B9AC89FB-C656-42C7-9204-C2B3AC6B8E29@csperkins.org> <544E7586.4080703@gmail.com> <22D97583-2E07-417C-84CC-923FD83C008C@csperkins.org> <544E781D.50305@gmail.com> <17742E9C-CCDD-4EFE-A2C1-C84531A0523F@csperkins.org> <544E7E2B.6040809@gmail.com> <9DEB3428-1B9E-4876-A6B5-B4CCE69D84AE@csperkins.org> <CAOJ7v-2wN-ff4RrM3rARYU=kwefj=MJ6mMD21a9_FXFpdYg8Og@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2duT7UJZavAJKVWU6vv-Aby-L=Urjyk+KiPBb1UPNhYY1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2duT7UJZavAJKVWU6vv-Aby-L=Urjyk+KiPBb1UPNhYY1w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090003010106010009070101"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Ip-_4YZ0deZ2T8kFh-By3nrsOow
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Drop RFC 4588 RTX session multiplexing support requirement from RTP USAGE
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:10:07 -0000

On 28/10/2014 4:41, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Justin said:
>
> "I don't think the WG ever explicitly signed up for 
> session-multiplexing of RTX data"
>
> [BA] I agree, and in addition would say the same thing with respect to 
> FEC - one of the fundamental objections to RFC 5109 is that it only 
> support session-multiplexing, not SSRC multiplexing.
>

+1
Sergio