IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] JSEP examples need to be aligned with latest version of BUNDLE

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Sun, 10 December 2017 01:41 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3191275C5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 17:41:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id saFBDkJue0UR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 17:41:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B758E127599 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 17:41:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id e10so9800814uah.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 17:41:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k0qN6/9KFhCRBmLnHte8cu4cpdEJVMWWf2QnM07sqo0=; b=hl1ZeND05i1q5dFdfHHgcbA737tFs+2o1Ks18X+DM+bFwBbEL6Fw8SZrk3SPWgfDy/ TPh8laxd5koAIM8d/vcuAJT3FFs+7vYSG02nMxZIHuxZ2XZ1It+fYPolLNZdn2wVKzqe uflr3wg/jjWjxJuISSY1u3ME8j9wMRYS8HSy4WBi4/MXC/S9XI4PiB9JrDtFiD18BLc+ xUWstNN7ctfKO+XObtR/9pTatZy6GoNt3e7yfzQg/kKqSaKaNM//qYXd1o1PbFXX+ChB fTHZ4jptQdiqYGJQKbarEVuNu9XogZT3qZo987K/QGpLw2Yik/s2ZBZjFtV7+shsPn7K dZYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k0qN6/9KFhCRBmLnHte8cu4cpdEJVMWWf2QnM07sqo0=; b=qthnudWsvVCBfVcB90pjcIzdkzYPLJbMgVVUoP3fWUjQ8pKL/+1XdnBjgQwxmtqlp3 s9ZU83h3nqZsfvOJNOsKzDV2tzrtoT+8tEwImjXQ2XfGjvLsmonszIPUVpAHlqM1WoN1 Mtg+zyH7htS8/1MAvJ4potEv7z7x2g7iB2zV3cfnsz1Q9UkJqcsWNQOKseWH48lYH7cW 86nb4hNiKq25MvunWbWPPmhGXhNRURCBmNfqEDItgxujighKDx6PYgUFd0EcLfa7J5kS TFQy4DIPFoo+W8j+PC+ukc7ujBzoXDnnXDj/aKK8duIMc8tsld9cNy5+Qv5mWS/WR6Lt r9mQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIE5yHqyhM5nlIySsK05ErFUmf6fmrojzI5F42JAIxUqpHikxAn Son2FMGGhEkjt4V5PHpUY6HbtrRwr2lUDD1mBPvg7w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYLdj+a8gGTPE5GWjF4U64kxKtLTggiWqiLTb6IyPMb5/opmMvXPiS6wxuhlmKHnXwV7aYxMYmsudwOBz+DUco=
X-Received: by 10.159.51.2 with SMTP id o2mr23235631uab.194.1512870107215; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 17:41:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.178.204 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 17:41:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C046586@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
References: <D6504F83.272D8%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <CAOJ7v-2K162VodNUL18DnOV-4WXEr+VT3ehyfPC-Jfh7hati9A@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C046555@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C046586@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 17:41:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2tYUe+W6obNwJ6Jh9M11wGLJOKd3gfUmYsOyrqs7pQgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045dcc9c559e73055ff285e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/JUfA-LvfVVdoXy-Qligc5Rq_FXI>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JSEP examples need to be aligned with latest version of BUNDLE
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 01:41:51 -0000

https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/issues/843

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Note that I did NOT check whether other changes are needed in JSEP due to
> the changes in BUNDLE – I only checked the examples.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> *From:* rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Christer
> Holmberg
> *Sent:* 08 December 2017 21:33
> *To:* Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
> *Cc:* rtcweb@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] JSEP examples need to be aligned with latest
> version of BUNDLE
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> >Christer, can you summarize the differences? I will file an issue
> against JSEP.
>
>
>
> The initial offer is as before, i.e., you assign a unique address, SDP
> attributes etc to each bundled m- section.
>
>
>
> But, in the answer, and in every subsequent offer/answer, you only assign
> the BUNDLE port to the bundled m- section represented by the
> offerer/answerer BUNDLE-tag. To every other m- section you assign a zero
> port value and a bundle-only attribute (previously the bundle-only
> attribute was only defined for offers).
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Christer Holmberg <
> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> At some point some of the examples in section 7 of JSEP need to be
> updated, in order to align with the latest version of BUNDLE.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email