[rtcweb] #17: Section 6.1: Support for NACK
"rtcweb issue tracker" <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sat, 20 April 2013 01:32 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCADF21F909A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id etPcjvJMiX0x for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB9021F8FE5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35843 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1UTMfB-0001nR-BB; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:32:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: rtcweb issue tracker <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com
X-Trac-Project: rtcweb
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:32:25 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/rtcweb/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/ticket/17
Message-ID: <066.fa3a1be1719fe32561d53f4f0eb18295@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 17
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: csp@csperkins.org, jorg.ott@aalto.fi, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20130420013228.3BB9021F8FE5@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:32:28 -0700
Resent-From: trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] #17: Section 6.1: Support for NACK
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:32:28 -0000
#17: Section 6.1: Support for NACK
Senders are REQUIRED to understand the Generic NACK message defined
in Section 6.2.1 of [RFC4585], but MAY choose to ignore this feedback
(following Section 4.2 of [RFC4585]).
[BA] What does it mean to "understand" the generic NACK message? Are we
only asking that an implementation not crash if it receives such a
message? Or does this mean that support for NACK needs to be declared in
"rtcp-fb" attributes? If an implementation can "understand" NACK, and
declare support in SDP but then ignore the feedback, what does this
achieve?
--
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-
bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | usage@tools.ietf.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1
Component: rtp-usage | Version: 1.0
Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/ticket/17>
rtcweb <http://tools.ietf.org/rtcweb/>
- [rtcweb] #17: Section 6.1: Support for NACK rtcweb issue tracker
- Re: [rtcweb] #17: Section 6.1: Support for NACK Colin Perkins