Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 17 June 2011 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C40A11E8085 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-U8l8XunaVC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1B411E8074 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c17ae00000262e-aa-4dfb4837f265
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 4D.28.09774.7384BFD4; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:27:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.136]) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se ([10.2.3.125]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:26:16 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:26:15 +0200
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document
Thread-Index: Acws5hB0BRk0+ms9RRq/nd/rMz2+4QAA4J0Q
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585194E3E74C5@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <4DFB09AC.1090001@ericsson.com> <BANLkTin07tRyCTmjqQk-veP7GkVsKJ+vXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin07tRyCTmjqQk-veP7GkVsKJ+vXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:27:38 -0000
Hi Mary, >I think the document is a good starting point, although, I personally would prefer that the mapping would should the use cases that were used to derive the requirements versus the requirements >that are derived from the use case. We can fix that. >Otherise, you have to search through the use cases to see the one from which the requirement was derived. Or perhaps having the mapping both directions. > >Also, I would suggest some reformatting so that new use cases can be easily added - i.e., it doesn't look like the list is a result of the <list>...</list> xml formatting. If that's not the >case, I still don't like this dashy list style. We can fix that too. Thanks! Regards, Christer On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote: WG, We would like to adopt a WG document with the purpose for describing use cases for the RTCWEB work. This document would be targeted as publication as an Inforamtional RFC eventually. The candidate document for this is: Web Real-Time Communication Use-cases and Requirements https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-holmberg-rtcweb-ucreqs/ Based on our interim last week it was clear that there are some use cases that clearly needs development. However, the WG chairs believe that future development of the document can be done as WG item. WG participants please indicate if you agree in adopting this document as a basis, or if not, what the short comings you would like to see addressed prior to adoption. Once more, the document will be continued to be developed under the WG control and this is far from any final version. Please provide your view no later than Friday the 24th. Best Regards Magnus Westerlund WG chair ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Anil SRIVASTAVA
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] WG adoption for Use Case document Magnus Westerlund