Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-06.txt

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Sun, 10 March 2013 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF871F041A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwmJavsmSY7B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [93.93.130.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE4E21F865D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.209.254.15] (port=51430 helo=vpn15.dcs.gla.ac.uk) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1UEn9M-00055k-H9 for rtcweb@ietf.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:47:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130225211410.2172.19161.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:47:17 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <40F0DAC8-ECA3-46B0-B2C8-9305A5B21CEE@csperkins.org>
References: <20130225211410.2172.19161.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-06.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:47:24 -0000

On 25 Feb 2013, at 16:14, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC): Media Transport and Use of RTP
> 	Author(s)       : Colin Perkins
>                          Magnus Westerlund
>                          Joerg Ott
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-06.txt
> 	Pages           : 62
> 	Date            : 2013-02-25
> 
> Abstract:
>   The Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) framework provides support
>   for direct interactive rich communication using audio, video, text,
>   collaboration, games, etc. between two peers' web-browsers.  This
>   memo describes the media transport aspects of the WebRTC framework.
>   It specifies how the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) is used in
>   the WebRTC context, and gives requirements for which RTP features,
>   profiles, and extensions need to be supported.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-06


This is a minor updates. The changes are:

- Expand and clarify discussion of RTP session multiplexing in Section 4.4

- Add Section 7.2 on RTCP extensions for congestion control

- Clarify Section 12.1 on RTP Sessions and PeerConnections

- Expand Section 12.4 on SSRC collision detections

- Rewrite and clarify Section 12.5 on Contributing Sources and the CSRC list

- Rewrite and clarify Section 12.9 on differentiated treatment of flows

- Expand security considerations

There's time on the agenda to discuss use of RTCP XR metrics, which is one of the open issues with this draft. If there are any more general comments, please send them by email.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/