IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives-00.txt

"Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)" <richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 18 February 2013 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AE721F8B51; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.870, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z=0.259]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rx8l1oTMD+hm; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:08:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886F421F88AE; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:08:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id r1IM8hLW027475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:08:43 +0100
Received: from US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.36) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:08:43 +0100
Received: from US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.12.105]) by US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.36]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:08:41 -0500
From: "Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)" <richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHODiLaQ3NGrbmfrEqTjL/GIyKINpiAKZHw
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:08:40 +0000
Message-ID: <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F36EA6762@US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: [rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:08:46 -0000

Please note that I have also submitted a draft on how to fix BUNDLE.  This doc is based on the modified BUNDLE proposal with different port information for each m line and compares several different additional modifications to BUNDLE.  The doc ends up recommending the use of the unspecified address for subsequent m lines in a bundle group in the SDP answer (not offer).  Please see the doc for details.

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 3:57 PM
To: Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Richard Ejzak and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives
Revision:	 00
Title:		 Alternatives to BUNDLE
Creation date:	 2013-02-18
Group:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 7
URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives-00.txt
Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives-00


Abstract:
   This paper discusses some potential modifications to the BUNDLE
   proposal for multiplexing of multiple media types within a single
   5-tuple to address limitations of the current proposal and
   alternatives already considered by MMUSIC.

                                                                                  


The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email