Re: [rtcweb] [tram] Payload Types assignments

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Thu, 13 March 2014 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBB21A096A; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGi_Kt-71k_u; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6CE1A095E; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id A7FE3C94BD; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:00:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:00:09 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Karl Stahl <karl.stahl@intertex.se>
Message-ID: <20140313140009.GS18217@verdi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/SmwJvvkjCHveL2XKeQRpe2hmNNk
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, tram@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [tram] Payload Types assignments
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:00:19 -0000

Karl Stahl <karl.stahl@intertex.se> wrote:
> 
> [879 lines]
> [2135 lines]
> [816 lines]
> [1598 lines]

   I do appreciate your commitment to our tasks, Karl, but there is
no hope that very many of us can slog through all that text.

   If you want wide readership, may I suggest you limit the number
of lines you impose on the rest of us per day?

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>