Re: [rtcweb] #18: Section 6.2: FEC
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Mon, 06 May 2013 22:44 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C6821F92CB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NiRLR0rG1y0F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [93.93.130.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FA921F91CA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=40385 helo=[192.168.0.11]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1UZU9K-0007xL-Qx; Mon, 06 May 2013 23:44:52 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <066.b392c6b846aaf34b02197d493399c8e9@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 23:44:49 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <699B6B07-86F5-4642-AC58-1846C242E5DB@csperkins.org>
References: <066.b392c6b846aaf34b02197d493399c8e9@trac.tools.ietf.org>
To: rtcweb issue tracker <trac+rtcweb@grenache.tools.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage@tools.ietf.org, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #18: Section 6.2: FEC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 22:44:59 -0000
I'm open to suggestions, but it's not clear what we would recommend here. My preference is to leave this for version 2. Colin On 20 Apr 2013, at 02:37, rtcweb issue tracker wrote: > #18: Section 6.2: FEC > > At the time > of this writing there is no consensus on which, if any, of these FEC > schemes is appropriate for use in the WebRTC context. Accordingly, > this memo makes no recommendation on the choice of block-based FEC > for WebRTC use. > > [BA] By being vague on both NACK as well as FEC requirements, I think > we've set ourselves up for issues with respect to implementation quality > if not interoperability. In practice, it may be possible to come up with > some advice to FEC implementers (perhaps not at a REQUIRED but a > RECOMMENDED level). So I think we might want to revisit this. > > -- > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp- > bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | usage@tools.ietf.org > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 > Component: rtp-usage | Version: 1.0 > Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > > Ticket URL: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/ticket/18> > rtcweb <http://tools.ietf.org/rtcweb/> > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb -- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/
- [rtcweb] #18: Section 6.2: FEC rtcweb issue tracker
- Re: [rtcweb] #18: Section 6.2: FEC Colin Perkins