[rtcweb] RTCWEB data channel protocol: Mandated to use?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 28 January 2014 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483C81A003E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:28:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S5qwZzVvhLJJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0A11A0018 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:28:33 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f418e000001099-dd-52e76a2ee35b
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 96.E4.04249.E2A67E25; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:28:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.99]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:28:29 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RTCWEB data channel protocol: Mandated to use?
Thread-Index: Ac8cAngQ5gMoLtdxSK+NK5iG67ycPg==
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:28:28 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D143FB4@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.147]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D143FB4ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja5e1vMgg0Xf1C3W/mtnd2D0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXRsf5PUwFm6QqnlzZwt7AOEG8i5GTQ0LARGLB05NMELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hASOMEq8ebGECcJZzCjxufUCYxcjBwebgIVE9z9tkAYRAXWJyw8vsIPYwgLmEkve 72GDiNtIrLi9iAXC1pM4Pn0b2AIWAVWJtT0vwcbwCvhKfJoVDxJmBNr7/dQasBJmAXGJW0/m Q90jILFkz3lmCFtU4uXjf6wgrRICShLTtqZBlOdLLH9+CWwTr4CgxMmZT1gmMArNQjJpFpKy WUjKIOI6Egt2f2KDsLUlli18zQxjnznwmAlZfAEj+ypGjuLU4qTcdCODTYzAoD+45bfFDsbL f20OMUpzsCiJ83586xwkJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgXGyv+ze34bnN90NzOk4 sGWZZlHFVu3Zqjlb/wu3bFqpzmn+s1Xtzwyn7pQnvdFCja3lX/tXH+731VKN+q/cOXfmr8wJ HO2cndHX65K01RhzJjY/Oi76/7Oxy6QM7e/ZvYKW90tZlcSibr9Sd/3GbMj2PKO3b+qum1Or dPTM+zv3JPq6eH7ap8RSnJFoqMVcVJwIAMNNadhIAgAA
Subject: [rtcweb] RTCWEB data channel protocol: Mandated to use?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:28:36 -0000

Hi,

At the CLUE virtual interim yesterday, we discussed the usage of the RTCWEB data channel also for CLUE. It would allow us to re-use what RTCWEB has done, and it would provide interoperability between CLUE entities and RTCWEB.

Q1: One question that came up is whether RTCWEB MANDATES the usage of the RTCWEB data channel protocol? OR, is it possible to simply establish two SCTP streams (as defined in draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06), and start using it?

Regards,

Christer