[rtcweb] Fwd: [rmcat] Update on coupled congestion control

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Wed, 07 May 2014 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B331A06CD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 04:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l6l8F-_m5iK6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 04:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out4.uio.no (mail-out4.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577A41A06D1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 04:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([]) by mail-out4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1Whzoi-0001VG-Cp for rtcweb@ietf.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 13:15:16 +0200
Received: from boomerang.ifi.uio.no ([]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1Whzoh-0003Bj-L0; Wed, 07 May 2014 13:15:16 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_37637BB9-DC47-4F69-A2A9-4453EFECEDB1"
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 13:15:15 +0200
References: <98B4752B-9609-4372-8145-5025992345DA@ifi.uio.no>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Message-Id: <A01E915E-CFCC-4836-B221-C9FDFA208527@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 4 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 4 sum msgs/h 2 total rcpts 16143 max rcpts/h 44 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.051, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 0AEE8974A692F499A91A8E60B3DDE1B2CA15A51A
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: spam_score: -59 maxlevel 99990 minaction 1 bait 0 mail/h: 2 total 5215 max/h 16 blacklist 0 greylist 1 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Z9xBkuRIBfNQBFaMu4X6Yx76GDw
Cc: Safiqul Islam <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: [rtcweb] Fwd: [rmcat] Update on coupled congestion control
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 11:15:23 -0000

Dear all,

We're doing some work on coupled congestion control in RMCAT which I think is quite related to the ongoing discussion on prioritization in this group. We just submitted an update of our draft:

... and the email below has some more information for those who might be interested.


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
> Subject: [rmcat] Update on coupled congestion control
> Date: 2. mai 2014 13:11:42 GMT+02:00
> To: rmcat WG <rmcat@ietf.org>
> Dear all,
> We'd like to share an update about our work on coupled congestion control: we have developed and evaluated an algorithm that we think works pretty well, and documented our results in this technical report:
> http://safiquli.at.ifi.uio.no/paper/fse-tech-report.pdf
> A shorter version of this document was accepted for publication in the ACM SIGCOMM'14 Capacity Sharing Workshop.
> The results were done with simulations, using TFRC (as a representative for a multimedia-oriented congestion control scheme) and RAP (as a rate-based AIMD scheme); we're currently working with LEDBAT (as a representative for a delay-based scheme), and once we've covered that, we'll approach real-life testing!
> The updated algorithm (algorithm 2 in the document, on page 7) isn't incorporated in draft-welzl-rmcat-coupled-cc yet, we're working on an update of this draft and plan to submit it soon, stay tuned!
> Any comments are very welcome!
> Cheers,
> Michael