IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec-01.txt

Barry Dingle <btdingle@gmail.com> Tue, 10 March 2015 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <btdingle@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9CD1AD151 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qnQ06sOiWFJr for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562391AD0D2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lams18 with SMTP id s18so13360768lam.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VTuTEbuIfJDKqQaoD1jiljeGjuKgXCkne3eTiKTjpXg=; b=G7tDicXD2JOSXDixdXu4G0lb+ZGDgJps82nP+WS/EujEkDb+yFyjwm4WT/9WYPX9xS Qx5CcDzhvYaAG+Cg9a7khbYMWhx9/1zRR7qmoSrtTCBlFPUesDAmXQKGn2CfRU3U/zkr 04vkwTwDW3H5XpFEU/DkpiJ2fLU5o5HmRoyk02+AhqDIbRcVHeyoPWOyzBodVRN8mgnp imDiNsCEzgL87HddvVhIy6shlvDCS4wwENC3JozbT8jeicxCXyyOrgr6ptlhWBV6rmyc kzzBnN4bOOCkbDysDMbaq2RmDMwyGg5nXGbxwvI050hB0S9PzewOHACZcmYcXg8hMymO LdpA==
X-Received: by 10.152.179.139 with SMTP id dg11mr22753069lac.28.1425957642841; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.41.4 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-1fT0xWSsDAV-q=OP0=DCfbCTY-rMpbjokBec0Hociu9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150309044740.4941.89516.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOJ7v-0hyAy=YeWdhn7GVFyPVEbYHTj4cGkM8rSY1P_7JPLwfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1fT0xWSsDAV-q=OP0=DCfbCTY-rMpbjokBec0Hociu9A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Dingle <btdingle@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:20:22 +1100
Message-ID: <CAN=GVAsyqnRPNORO8SZik5gSnKoZdZ9SjioiFdaVEBbYMfK+Ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11349192c435940510e6a27c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ZawmenqBKFlDr8U1D3Jdk-nVBvk>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 03:20:47 -0000

Was the suggestion to change the Title to "WebRTC *Media* Forward Error
Correction Requirements" - because there is no mention of Data Channel FEC
in this draft - accepted?

If not, why not?

Barry Dingle
= = =

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> [fixing cc list]
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
>
>> This version incorporates the feedback from Honolulu, as well as several
>> comments from the list.
>>
>> The Honolulu feedback suggested removing support for redundant audio with
>> codecs like PCMU, but I did get a request for this on the list, so I left
>> it in.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:47 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>>  This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in
>>> WEB-browsers Working Group of the IETF.
>>>
>>>         Title           : WebRTC Forward Error Correction Requirements
>>>         Author          : Justin Uberti
>>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec-01.txt
>>>         Pages           : 7
>>>         Date            : 2015-03-08
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>    This document provides information and requirements for how Forward
>>>    Error Correction (FEC) should be used by WebRTC applications.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec/
>>>
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec-01
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec-01
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email