Re: [rtcweb] Protocol Action: 'Transports for WebRTC' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-17.txt)
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sat, 29 October 2016 06:48 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A20129432; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.331
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.331 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68NjzuU2Qf0b; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B1E61293E4; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3E27C0B4B; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:48:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r48bqYtuAsXA; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:48:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:1:40e9:5b1e:a3cd:b35e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:1:40e9:5b1e:a3cd:b35e]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1D107C099C; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:48:49 +0200 (CEST)
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports@ietf.org
References: <147757582191.24720.3318382294190482547.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0C0ADCED-389F-4D26-8C64-AB58BA20B85A@sn3rd.com>
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <fea6d613-c53a-8d5f-5018-12dd87f18793@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:48:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0C0ADCED-389F-4D26-8C64-AB58BA20B85A@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/dKfS4HDzMUSmyyYD5hfQnsyQDhs>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Protocol Action: 'Transports for WebRTC' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-17.txt)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 06:48:56 -0000
On 10/28/2016 02:59 AM, Sean Turner wrote: > Congrats! Another draft has progressed down the road: > https://giphy.com/gifs/car-reactiongifs-mrw-T4YX44tlqOKaI/fullscreen Hooray! It is now part of RFC Editor's cluster 238, a giant snarl of dependencies: https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C238 An outstanding item here is the -security drafts; do we have any updated status on those? > > spt > >> On Oct 27, 2016, at 09:43, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> The IESG has approved the following document: >> - 'Transports for WebRTC' >> (draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-17.txt) as Proposed Standard >> >> This document is the product of the Real-Time Communication in >> WEB-browsers Working Group. >> >> The IESG contact persons are Alexey Melnikov, Ben Campbell and Alissa >> Cooper. >> >> A URL of this Internet Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Technical Summary >> >> This document describes the data transport protocols used by WebRTC, >> including the protocols used for interaction with intermediate boxes >> such as firewalls, relays and NAT boxes. >> >> Working Group Summary >> >> Nothing particularly controversial in this spec. It is largely just a >> pointer to other specifications saying if you do WebRTC, then you need >> to what RFC X,Y, and Z says. >> >> Based on the WGLC comments, the chairs suggest adding an RFC Ed note >> to include an informative reference to draft-ietf-rtcweb-return >> however there is not WG consensus to make this a MUST or SHOULD >> implement. (Cleary nothing forbids implementing it so it is already an >> MAY implement) >> >> Document Quality >> >> Much of this is implemented in chrome and firefox which share a >> significant amount of code with respect to this so some parts of it >> has 2 implementations, some parts 1, and some none. >> >> Personnel >> >> Cullen Jennings is the document shepherd. Alissa Cooper is the >> responsible AD. -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
- [rtcweb] Protocol Action: 'Transports for WebRTC'… The IESG
- Re: [rtcweb] Protocol Action: 'Transports for Web… Sean Turner
- Re: [rtcweb] Protocol Action: 'Transports for Web… Harald Alvestrand