Re: [rtcweb] Taxonomy

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 17 July 2013 11:07 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C366921F9948; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 04:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7BkwHXD8h6U; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 04:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BF521F9D4A; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 04:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r6HB6nwZ009557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 06:06:50 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r6HB6lVR032483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:06:49 +0200
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.194]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:06:48 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Taxonomy
Thread-Index: Ac6CNDlORSwpM9rIQtax1T6pBvHv5gAACsrAACo7ARA=
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:06:48 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B06B7FA@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Taxonomy
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:07:02 -0000

Breaking my own rule about cross posting...

Just wanted to add is that this document would not be retrospective, i.e. we would not start rewriting the existing published RFCs to take into account the new terminology.

The expectation however is that documents going forward from other working groups would use the new terminology rather than other terms. 

Obviously how this is handled is up to the individual working groups, but using the new terminology will be the only good way of making your results understandable outside your specific field.

So that is why your review and input is important.

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: 16 July 2013 15:58
> To: mmusic@ietf.org; rtcweb@ietf.org; clue@ietf.org; dispatch@ietf.org;
> avt@ietf.org
> Subject: FW: Taxonomy
> 
> Extensive cross-post do not reply to this email.
> 
> For information. We do expect participation input from all the listed
> working groups (and possibly more).
> 
> Keith
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: avtext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avtext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: 16 July 2013 15:53
> To: avtext@ietf.org
> Subject: [avtext] Taxonomy
> 
> (As AVTEXT WG cochair)
> 
> The latest version of the RTP taxonomy draft has been submitted.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-raiarea-rtp-grouping-
> taxonomy/
> 
> This document was allocated to AVTEXT by DISPATCH, and we have created a
> milestone for it in AVTEXT.
> 
> This draft is not yet a working group document.
> 
> We do expect to spend some significant meeting time discussing the
> contents in the AVTEXT meeting in Berlin, so please start raising your
> issues on the AVTEXT list.
> 
> Additionally, if there are counter proposals existing that the AVTEXT
> chairs would not otherwise be aware of, then please identify them to the
> AVTEXT chairs / list.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> avtext mailing list
> avtext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avtext