[rtcweb] BTW where are we at with MTI codecs?
"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Sat, 22 September 2012 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A3621F86B1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.343
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.449, BAYES_50=0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Arlof0JyHkdX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy9.bluehost.com (oproxy9.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E76021F859F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20064 invoked by uid 0); 22 Sep 2012 19:19:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by oproxy9.bluehost.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2012 19:19:44 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=6E32gmtsWXvs7x3oSdCWQmN6FNgO4pfFRwXycsmsnMU=; b=IwpdwuKZtftO2ZQCvTvwjR1oW/M086SiEy6whESH5yWwmqtPJj6rtOy07LUSLIe6E3a5LcHsFocJ7XGrYXqlFiSjdujVZ/aRFKD7WFpz4Ho7dUdGx08u4W1bQH3jL2zX;
Received: from [71.191.243.130] (port=52307 helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1TFVEt-0005XZ-TH for rtcweb@ietf.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:19:44 -0600
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:19:40 -0400
Message-ID: <004101cd98f7$37afbae0$a70f30a0$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0042_01CD98D5.B09E1AE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac2Y9zZzgDBH7SjBQ/eFTQIiU1hVug==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 71.191.243.130 authed with richard@shockey.us}
Subject: [rtcweb] BTW where are we at with MTI codecs?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:19:46 -0000
I do want to make it clear that SHOULD's should be included. I really really believe 722 AMR WB needs to be included in order to properly interoperate with Public SIP Networks (the former PSTN) and soon to be deployed Voice over LTE. Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting Chairman of the Board of Directors SIP Forum PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683 < <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> skype-linkedin-facebook: rshockey101 http//www.sipforum.org
- [rtcweb] BTW where are we at with MTI codecs? Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] BTW where are we at with MTI codecs? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [rtcweb] BTW where are we at with MTI codecs? Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] BTW where are we at with MTI codecs? Magnus Westerlund