Re: [rtcweb] Reg retransmissions using JSEP approach.

[kiran kumar <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for your quick respnse,

Thanks,
Kiran.

On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> On Jun 9, 2012, at 7:26 , kiran kumar wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am new to this list, so please don't mind if I am repeating the same
> question, if it has already discussed in this list.
> >
> > My doubt is regarding how JSEP style of implementation will
> differentiate the retransmission of messges with out ROAP.
> >
> > According to few mails and discussion lists, It is specified that ROAP
> is going to be replaced by JSEP.
> > But in updated JSEP draft an example with ROAP is also provided.
> >
> > If ROAP is going to be replaced by JSEP, which part of JSEP will
> differentiate the retransmitted offers.
> > ROAP is having "seq" field to differentiate it.
> > Is that part going to be completely left to the application protocol ?
> >
>
> Yes, I think the idea i the application would have to deal with that. It
> probably needs to keep track of the keeping between the offer / answers to
> the seq number too so that if an offer is rejected and it rolls back to reg
> previous offer, it has that offer so it can roll back. At the same time
> browser implementation  also need to keep track of the various offers so
> they can roll back. More text is needed in the drafts on all this.
>
>