Re: [rtcweb] ICE and draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp

[Salvatore Loreto <[e-mail]>]

Hi Cullen,

On 3/19/12 3:00 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> I like draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp but I'd like to see it have more stuff in it. Specifically I would like it to
>
> 1) clearly define how to do the SDP for use of SCTP over DTLS over UPD with ICE. This is the use case we need to solve
right,
in Quebec we decided not to specify the ICE usage for *plain* SCTP in 
this draft...
but for sure we have to define the usage of SCTP over DTLS with ICE in 
the draft

>
> 2) make sure it works with bundle
+1

>
> 3) SCTP has sub addresses (SCTP Channels), I think these need to be negotiated as well in some cases so I would like to see an optional way of negotiating and signaling the channels including correlation with some sort of application defined label

yep,  we can define a way to signal/negotiate the number of channels we 
want initially in the association vs having this number configured;
and eventually even go further e.g. negotiate the addition of channels, 
and perhaps some sort of correlation of a channel
with an application defined label


Salvatore

-- 
Salvatore Loreto, PhD
www.sloreto.com