Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for RTCWEB Milestone Update
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 23 January 2014 10:14 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8421A024C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 02:14:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nckIjMBzfAim for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 02:14:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg20.mgmt.ericsson.se (sessmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D471A0355 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 02:14:58 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb32-b7f4c8e0000012f5-c9-52e0eba0f278
Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg20.mgmt.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 25.B4.04853.0ABE0E25; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:14:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:14:56 +0100
Message-ID: <52E0EB9F.7000907@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:14:55 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <52E0DE9A.1090405@ericsson.com> <52E0E8DD.6060106@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <52E0E8DD.6060106@alvestrand.no>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6C1w+CDB4uNLM41tfFZrH2Xzu7 A5PHlQlXWD2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXx4ZtKwUnBisf9m1kbGCfxdTFyckgImEis f/GdEcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DACUaJhQtvMkE4yxklVrXcYeli5ODgFdCW2HPQHKSBRUBV4vGW xWDNbAIWEjd/NLKB2KICwRK3pj1gB7F5BQQlTs58wgJiiwjYS1yc8xLMFhawknjXd4IJZKSQ gI/Er2awezgFdCVurrvPDhKWEBCX6GkMAgkzC+hJTLnawghhy0s0b53NDGILAR3T0NTBOoFR cBaSZbOQtMxC0rKAkXkVo2RxanFxbrqRgV5uem6JXmpRZnJxcX6eXnHqJkZgwB7c8ttoB+PJ PfaHGKU5WJTEea+z1gQJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbFF5XmpBYfYmTi4JRqYLQ66b02fbnVzgU/Xl5h Cq95vuThG7nyh29STmvGGaxo8/DOf5XDFjOtW7X89+RzWgy1IqsyFOXXH2Kssp25UGyJzKqF EgujLmlt8z3eMGOPTEOX4Ruvh7f/SWe7P32+2yhiZVWD4lsh2SeTpzIaTJjakv/4pG7QlhX9 rYe2yvTcW6/17aXl7VtKLMUZiYZazEXFiQDCwK0RJgIAAA==
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for RTCWEB Milestone Update
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:15:00 -0000
On 2014-01-23 11:03, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Mostly, this looks realistic.
>
> One place where I'm more optimistic:
>
> On 01/23/2014 10:19 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>> Old: New milestone
>> New: Sep 2014
>> Send Specification of Transport Protocols and their NAT Traversal to
>> IESG for publication as Proposed Standard
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports
>>
>
> Given that there has been fairly small controversies here, I feel that
> this should be doable in the same timeframe as rtp-usage - that is, April.
That would be great. I am a bit hesitant to put to many documents into
this time-frame. In addition I wonder if we are certain that we have
ensure that all pieces that are required to be part of this document are
known already in April. I am mostly thinking of the ongoing discussions
around NAT traversal protocols. However, if you like to have a shorter
target date, what about June? That should allow both RTP parts, the data
channel parts and this NAT/FW traversal protocol stuff to settled with
no big open ends.
>
> If the chairs' decision is that the normative parts of -firewalls- needs
> to go into -transport-, I would aim this for September.
>
> Note: There is no mention of -firewalls- in the milestones suggested.
> What's the chairs' thinking on this?
Sorry, this I realize is one editing I should have done, but forgot to
do before sending this out to the WG. I was considering to clarify that
it specifies the protocols used for NAT/FW traversal. But after
discussion the chairs did come to conclusion to keep the milestone
simple. Thus the proposal for milestone text should be:
Send Specification of Transport Protocols to IESG for publication
as Proposed Standard
Cheers
Magnus Westerlund
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [rtcweb] Proposal for RTCWEB Milestone Update Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for RTCWEB Milestone Update Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for RTCWEB Milestone Update Magnus Westerlund