Re: [rtcweb] Browser update rates

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Fri, 21 October 2011 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C9C21F8B9A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UhhcbqXHz8HP for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8A21F8B90 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.22) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:18:34 -0400
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.230]) by Mail2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:18:35 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Browser update rates
Thread-Index: AQHMkAm53veooeqBm06GAI9E6DvMapWHOSaAgAAD+wA=
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:18:33 +0000
Message-ID: <F7A20767-9D03-4D5B-A598-8F1DE8D9D3EA@acmepacket.com>
References: <4EA195B1.4010705@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMi-v1EXU0vU+a+amaeeYdsQiFhfcLGWBRjghO5sxfKpmw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAJUQMi-v1EXU0vU+a+amaeeYdsQiFhfcLGWBRjghO5sxfKpmw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [216.41.24.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E848C79293870047B832CBF4DAECAB5A@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Browser update rates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:18:37 -0000

Yeah it's IE as I said on the call. :(
C'est la vie.


On Oct 21, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Wolfgang Beck wrote:

> The differences in adoption rate between IE and Chrome are interesting.
> 
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> I found this webpage. No idea of how authoritative it is.
>> 
>> http://www.netmagazine.com/features/developers-guide-browser-adoption-rates
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb