IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 30 May 2013 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D368E21F9467 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qZPAv0pjeoF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E39021F9485 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=390; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1369934866; x=1371144466; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Z+WLDa2V+2UqfgoR55glFZFs2doC3eSWLyMXIPi+Nzo=; b=m9k77QSBeAJkV7C0BJeMsiR1BD1Ce6q40ixGLLaDZeooLIgbzPEjbV4Y M3Bm/fZ3cgIdvc1SQGVouYtwN8vL+VTSv4oMMqAspNGzuPD9TJiSAgomV SLEZMyR20QboWF24cwCwzV2GA4zENYGTOA2z3LrTaccTFNsHafoicPVbJ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmwFAI+Kp1GtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABZgwmDJK0AkiJ+FnSCIwEBAQMBeQULAgEIIiQyJQIEDgUIh3MDCQa7cIxEgiUCMQeCdmEDiGiMcY4ChSODD4In
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,772,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="216833602"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2013 17:27:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4UHRjBb015421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 May 2013 17:27:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.36]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 30 May 2013 12:27:45 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00
Thread-Index: AQHOXVr/UMZXG2rPG0q7AkRHIl0/3A==
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:26:48 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11352439A@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <BLU169-W1158BEB6CD5A0828D7D866293A60@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU169-W1158BEB6CD5A0828D7D866293A60@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <19AA0565FF81CC4DB73C8F2926822DDD@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:27:54 -0000

On May 11, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:

> To some extent this document is arguing against a straw man (individual m= lines for RTP streams) that in its extreme case  (dozens of RTP streams, possibly with simulcast and layered coding) is quite impractical.

Can you say a bit more about why it is impractical to have lots of m line ?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email