[rtcweb] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-03: (with COMMENT)

[Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

As with many of the other ballots:
1: I don't really understand this protocol but
2: I do like the 'diff's :-)

I'd also like to thank Qin Wu for the [OpsDir
review](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02-opsdir-lc-wu-2022-03-27/),
and also the authors for addressing them
(https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/pull/1025) - from what I can tell (see #1
:-)), this improved the document.