Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs

"Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com> Mon, 25 November 2013 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mzanaty@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363131ADF8C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:14:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnzV96R1XUEw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:14:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E37E1ADF88 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:14:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=288; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1385396072; x=1386605672; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=GT0P1QhQExBkwUor4ypVgjsI1WX3sFQ5hT1l8BN7Wh8=; b=HukcvUux+RjYdcypnkYwMiHtQZVRT5qFYXotmlhlt1Swl5W5nA+CA7tO Hy7yiAD8Js1SRrqvhWllCP4q5C62aL06N6RLUM/aV7Aoef/kyaSOSoU75 +yKEY2Sfqw1MUYYJpgTMaZhFkrEyt+vFyRqZmja3XddTryYNiEIInYdbE I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEFAAR3k1KtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgweBC7wmgSoWdIImAQEEeRACAQhGMiUCBAENBYgBvgQXjwcHhDMDiQqPCpISgyiCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,768,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="2063856"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2013 16:14:32 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAPGEWwF000417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:14:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.50]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:14:32 -0600
From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stefan_H=E5kansson_LK?= <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Paul Giralt (pgiralt)" <pgiralt@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs
Thread-Index: AQHO6flsKdvHgHey70mbUw906FaQwA==
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:14:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CEB8E164.1F1A6%mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <CEB676E0.1ED44%mzanaty@cisco.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C3F5B06@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C3F5B06@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.150.30.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <8553C67CCF5A0B4880C50753626889FC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:14:33 -0000

On 11/25/13, 9:09 AM, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>; wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by the dependency on bundle. Do you mean that
if bundle is not used the result would be that twice the number of ports
would be needed for a symmetrical session?

Yes.