[rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview status

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 01:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8EF129B73 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v_0yb1R14TwO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD2311243F6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r63so35175809itc.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 18:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=/BzZEZ6SMQo12VGT2L8bYAfANAZUlWBXrIoT5tdl4p8=; b=CYqFIBGZSFrqHvHEVNXDtkmq5WhIHzOveul+pHzHvCUA2mLENhKn4kIAGPxHv1+nkk QcSjj4mhtwJM56vy3ri6+ABGvOl1RgC90/uPaZpbSS5bqV8k5GEK0w0QzKvz2QBq84Os D5jQI7cB0VbDaLN20NSo7bjrwYvCiGVJW5pdM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=/BzZEZ6SMQo12VGT2L8bYAfANAZUlWBXrIoT5tdl4p8=; b=DraTYhfNiAb3JtdbxyzQby0Lc2i4NVGUQ1h2euLEn5aCdwmdeqxqWVLk3zUh0VvHhu KmZ+YMJkZOLwyg9IVo4ibbr6Mza6Lny8A2SkuXXG4oELDRC4JvU+KrqLKulM3iQsWiaT RxJ/Z32XzzF3r6qGkjoworQfew2PPyR5ORMlRANVFntNM7kj3P22LHu4NP9jVxw0Nttd FlA+yn6IX8jTq4V1aP+kTTYMqHk58VsW2QzsshJD/PAoXrq4+q4IOh5+yG89w6iC4to5 rBBzC+DO6IbmabhIO2SHAlDxY5y3rDD9602f+fWRY4LXKTyBkItXGC3AYa+QOXsgQd6I /eyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDN/fxqceIdavBa8FoKVMAPkjlfV3GoPuM44YbYejX5UsdGIwXI skAMYxMz0zykYlsKwkx6fA==
X-Received: by 10.36.121.141 with SMTP id z135mr2328154itc.36.1496454676800; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 18:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.157] (vpn.snozzages.com. [204.42.252.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm2106812itg.3.2017.06.02.18.51.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 18:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <9640A231-0FB2-4BAC-9406-3C0E2AEBB709@sn3rd.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:51:09 -0400
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/pjxluIpPpVryXxgeU8bmpNnbn00>
Subject: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview status
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 01:51:19 -0000

All,

I’ve submitted a number of PRs to address the IESG review comments.  They can be found here:
https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/rtcweb-overview/pulls
All of the ADs have said they were fine with the changes, except ekr but I believe he will clear his discuss once he gets a chance to review the PR that addresses his discuss.  Please let the list know if you have any issues with the proposed changes as proposed by COB June 9th (in whatever timezone you’re in) because after that time the chairs are going to ping Harald while he’s on his walkabout to merge the PRs and submit a new version that our illustrious AD can move into the IESG approved state.

spt